Search for: "Dubin v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 52
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Photo by Soumil Kumar on Pexels.comBy: HR Fitzmorris The Supreme Court recently granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in Dubin v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 12:55 pm by Edward S. Zas
In case you missed it, the Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in Dubin v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 9:32 am by John Elwood
On Friday, the court granted review in three-time relist Dubin v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 9:38 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Issue summary is from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: Dubin v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 12:11 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the Sept. 28, Oct. 7, Oct. 14, Oct. 28 and Nov. 4 conferences) Dubin v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 11:43 am by John Elwood
California; and (2) whether the Navajo Nation can state a cognizable claim for breach of trust consistent with the Supreme Court’s holding in United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reversed in relevant part, rejecting the states’ nondelegation challenge; the court also concluded other claims were time-barred because the states acted more than a decade after CMS promulgated the rule. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 3:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In any event, whether plaintiff can ultimately prevail on these allegations is not relevant on this pre-answer motion to dismiss (see Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d 587, 589 [2d Dept 2014]). [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
Compared to the rest of the world, the United States does not have a unique problem with tax evasion. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The defendant’s evidentiary submissions did not establish that a material fact alleged in the complaint is not a fact at all and that no significant dispute exists regarding it (see Lopez v Lozner & Mastropietro, P.C., 166 AD3d 871, 873; see also Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d at 589). [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 4:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, accepting the facts alleged in the complaint as true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, the plaintiff stated a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see Tooma v Grossbarth, 121 AD3d at 1095-1096; Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d 587, 589 [2014]; Reynolds v Picciano, 29 AD2d 1012, 1012 [1968]). [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 4:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Here, accepting the facts alleged in the complaint as true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, the plaintiff stated a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see Tooma v Grossbarth, 121 AD3d at 1095-1096; Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d 587, 589; Reynolds v Picciano, 29 AD2d 1012, 1012). [read post]