Search for: "Dubin v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 52
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2022, 10:55 am
Dubin v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 9:41 am
The specific issue before the Court in Dubin v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 7:49 am
Photo by Soumil Kumar on Pexels.comBy: HR Fitzmorris The Supreme Court recently granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in Dubin v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 12:55 pm
In case you missed it, the Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in Dubin v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 9:32 am
On Friday, the court granted review in three-time relist Dubin v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 9:38 am
Issue summary is from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: Dubin v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 1:13 pm
United States. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 12:11 pm
(relisted after the Sept. 28, Oct. 7, Oct. 14, Oct. 28 and Nov. 4 conferences) Dubin v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 11:43 am
California; and (2) whether the Navajo Nation can state a cognizable claim for breach of trust consistent with the Supreme Court’s holding in United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 7:59 am
New Relist Dubin v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 1:31 pm
Dubin v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reversed in relevant part, rejecting the states’ nondelegation challenge; the court also concluded other claims were time-barred because the states acted more than a decade after CMS promulgated the rule. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 3:50 am
In any event, whether plaintiff can ultimately prevail on these allegations is not relevant on this pre-answer motion to dismiss (see Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d 587, 589 [2d Dept 2014]). [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
” The state has designated Oklahoma v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 12:03 pm
In 2018, Arrow sued Dubin to recover on the judgment. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 3:50 am
Compared to the rest of the world, the United States does not have a unique problem with tax evasion. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 2:16 pm
Billetts v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:28 am
The defendant’s evidentiary submissions did not establish that a material fact alleged in the complaint is not a fact at all and that no significant dispute exists regarding it (see Lopez v Lozner & Mastropietro, P.C., 166 AD3d 871, 873; see also Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d at 589). [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 4:33 am
Here, accepting the facts alleged in the complaint as true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, the plaintiff stated a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see Tooma v Grossbarth, 121 AD3d at 1095-1096; Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d 587, 589 [2014]; Reynolds v Picciano, 29 AD2d 1012, 1012 [1968]). [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 4:16 am
” “Here, accepting the facts alleged in the complaint as true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, the plaintiff stated a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see Tooma v Grossbarth, 121 AD3d at 1095-1096; Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d 587, 589; Reynolds v Picciano, 29 AD2d 1012, 1012). [read post]