Search for: "Duck v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 798
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Dodge, duck, dip, dive, and… dodge. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
SCOTUS Ducking the Trump Eligibility Question Now will Pressure the Court to Rule in his Favor Later
16 Feb 2024, 7:56 am
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
" Mitchell completely ducked "office under the United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
And tomorrow, Thursday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
But officials broke "[v]irtually every promise" they made. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:22 am
First, states’ rights. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:21 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am
A recent Washington Post column stated—misleadingly, if not just plain wrongly—that Google spent billions “to hide this setting from you. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm
Chubin et al. at 10, Daubert v. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 4:49 pm
Cal.) in Crowley v. [read post]
Of Insurrections, Presidents, and the Utter Failure of Constitutional Law to Address the Real Issues
14 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
It is so messy that in the landmark Bruen gun case from 2022 the majority raised the issue of whether gun rights as applied to the states come from the Second Amendment or the 14th Amendment and explicitly ducked the question. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 2:06 pm
Woods Tr. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm
Candidly, if one begins by seeing the duck, it is often hard to see the rabbit (and vice versa). [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Griswold v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:36 am
Justice Kavanaugh's decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 4:22 pm
[United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 3:11 am
The FCA has stated that serious breaches will be prioritised and that it will act “swiftly and assertively” where necessary. [read post]
