Search for: "Duck v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 799
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
” Now leading precedent in Canadian Aboriginal law, the decision produced in Delgamuukw v British Columbia has been cited countless times in both the courts and the legal academy. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Richard J. Pierce, Jr.
Administrative law scholars are odd ducks. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 1:17 pm by Holly Brezee
But if it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it’s probably adopted the nominative fair use doctrine regardless of whether it has expressly touched the issue since New Kids. [read post]
Beginning in the 1980s but picking up speed in 2011 in a case called AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 10:57 am by Michael Ehline
Posted on Car Accident Law Blog / Blog / Ultimate Guide to NHTSA v IIHS Testing Ratings Efforts to guarantee passenger safety and improve vehicle standards have given birth to two main authorities in safety performance testing, which are: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) Each of these independent vehicle safety bodies is responsible for conducting a new car assessment program on vehicles about to enter the market using… [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:33 pm by binder'sblog
He distributed photos of him as a duck hunter with a rifle in his hand. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 11:10 pm by Josh Blackman
The Chief did not disappoint in Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 12:21 pm by Florian Mueller
In light of what a Federal Circuit panel--Chief Judge Kimberly Moore and Circuit Judges Timothy Dyk and Raymond Chen--said at a Tuesday hearing in Thales v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 6:33 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
” The Supreme Court barely contemplated the text’s meaning in Heller v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]