Search for: "Duck v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 799
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
Similarly, in 2011 in Stern v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
Similarly, in 2011 in Stern v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 5:26 am
Last month, in Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 11:25 pm
New York’s Administrative Procedures Act does not require a State agency to issue a declaratory ruling when requestedMatter of Humane Society of United States, Inc. v Brennan, 63 AD3d 1419The genesis of this lawsuit was the New York State’s Department of Agriculture and Markets' declining to issue a declaration that foie gras* is an adulterated food product within the meaning of Agriculture and Markets Law §200. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 8:52 am
Yeaples v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 7:13 am
It is likely, though, that cases involving the duck boat accident will be heard in both federal and state court. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:33 pm
He distributed photos of him as a duck hunter with a rifle in his hand. [read post]
12 May 2020, 8:14 am
– Alexis & Doreen The post Useful Info During COVID v.4 appeared first on Law Office of Alexis B. [read post]
20 May 2008, 10:21 am
No state has added the death penalty for non-homicidal child rape in 2008. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 12:16 am
Here is the abstract: In Douglas v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
Cabrera v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:38 am
Bob Thomas won in State v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm
Candidly, if one begins by seeing the duck, it is often hard to see the rabbit (and vice versa). [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:24 am
In Marbury v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:01 pm
"**** Foie gras is a food product derived from the intentionally enlarged livers of ducks and geese. [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 3:06 pm
"United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:51 am
But the bird on the applied-for sign is a duck, which is nothing like a rooster ...* Artwork from Paul & Joe's Spring Collection 2012, on style frizz. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:29 am
Brown, the Court is revisiting that question in DaimlerChrysler AG v. [read post]
