Search for: "Duck v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 799
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2022, 11:44 am
Listen on mobile platforms: Apple Podcasts | Spotify Links discussed in this episode: “Google LLC v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm
It is no exaggeration to say that the history of the United States has never seen an account of a president’s conduct quite so devastating as the first nine pages of Judge David Carter’s opinion of March 28 in Eastman v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
The answer has recently been summarised in Viceroy Cayman Limited v Anthony Otto Syrowatka [2021] ATMO 159 (Viceroy v Syrowatka), stating “[i]t is well established that ownership of a trade mark is established either by authorship and prior use, or by the combination of authorship, the filing of the application and an intention to use or authorise use”. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
The answer has recently been summarised in Viceroy Cayman Limited v Anthony Otto Syrowatka [2021] ATMO 159 (Viceroy v Syrowatka), stating “[i]t is well established that ownership of a trade mark is established either by authorship and prior use, or by the combination of authorship, the filing of the application and an intention to use or authorise use”. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 1:33 pm
Cal.) in Crowley v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:40 pm
On Monday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit handed down its Continental v. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 2:19 pm
They state there that ’we present empirical evidence of “hold-up”—i.e., evidence of opportunistic behavior by SEP enforcers that is intended to unreasonably inflate royalties. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 10:26 pm
And the proposed statement on the public interest itself contains the name Apple only once--not with respect to Apple's funding of ACT, but as a reference to a case (Apple v. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 9:07 am
Capitol, lame-duck President Trump demanded Section 230’s repeal. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
The major doctrinal shift that would definitely change much of constitutional law is that the authors argue that the Court's holdings in The Civil Rights Cases and United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 6:32 am
And if not, do you think there is something to this idea that once people are told they have rights, that those rights are impaired by leaving them in a state of doubt? [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 1:29 pm
The Pfizer Case The Delaware Superior Court’s decision in Pfizer Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 4:42 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court heard oral argument on Monday in Federal Bureau of Investigation v. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 3:11 am
SB824 became law in 2018 after a supermajority of the North Carolina’s legislature overrode a veto by Governor Roy Cooper in what has been called a “lame duck” session. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 7:34 am
In April of this year, the Eleventh Circuit ducked the mootness issue. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 8:55 am
Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
And I was most definitely panicking.In the lame duck period between Election Day and Biden’s inauguration on January 20 earlier this year, some readers even argued that I and others were overstating the case in describing what Trump was doing as an attempted coup. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 10:21 am
Voters for Animal Rights v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 6:36 am
Haier decisions a total of 19 times (spread out over 16 pages).Judge Kuehnen chose to duck Sisvel v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 9:05 pm
California v. [read post]
