Search for: "Duffy v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 322
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
, (Daily Dose of IP), 26 August: WIPO symposium on IP and multilateral agreements – Geneva: (IPKat), 11-12 September: US LSI: 4th annual conference on ‘Current issues in complex IP licensing’ – Philadelphia: (Patent Docs), 11 September/15 October: PLI seminar on developments in pharmaceutical and biotech patent law – New York/San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 15-16 September: UniForum & SAIIPL domain name ADR workshop – Centurion (South… [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 2:55 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands to be… [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 1:10 pm
Calmar v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 2:51 pm
He concluded in Larabee v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:56 am
" The decision notes that "When a public officer's interest in employment is weighed against the interest of this State's citizens in having public officers possessed of moral integrity, "the balance must be struck in favor of the public. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 3:29 am
See alsoMore on Translogic and Duffy [read post]
20 May 2008, 2:09 am
If a ruling in an obscure tax case yesterday is any indication, the threshold for unacceptable chaos is surprisingly low.In Dept. of Revenue of Kentucky v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
: (GenericsWeb), Europe: New EBA referral T 1319/04 regarding patentability of known medicament for new treatment of same illness: (IPKat), Europe: Patentability of biotechnology in Europe: (IAM), Europe: New EPO Enlarged Board case referrals: T1319/04 Dosage Regimen, T1242/06 Essential Biological Process: (Hal Wegner), Thailand: Compulsory licensing: Affordable health for Thailand thanks to Matrix Labs: (Spicy IP), Thailand: European Parliament set to reprimand Mandelson for… [read post]
8 May 2008, 2:23 pm
State v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 2:01 pm
Supreme Court decision in Diamond v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 5:06 pm
One example of Dorf's Law in the United States may be McCleskey v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 9:01 pm
His analysis seems airtight under the most directly applicable Supreme Court precedent, Freytag v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:29 pm
Translogic Tech. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 8:31 am
Duffy (1987) 200 Cal.App.3d 730, 750 - 51. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:30 pm
Available at http://www.nacdl.org/CHAMPION/ARTICLES/98mar04.htm quoting from the book MAIN JUSTICE by Jim McGee and Brian Duffy. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 3:17 pm
Thomas McCarthy's seminal treatise on trademark law states his "who are you, what are you" test. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Record labels sue Baidu over providing links to file-sharing sites: (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360), (Copyfight), Merck’s Fosamax patent expires: Watson Pharmaceuticals to distribute authorized generic version, Teva and Barr also launch FDA approved generic versions: (SmartBrief), (Patent Circle), (In … [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 10:00 pm
Duffy (1987) 200 Cal.App.3d 730, 753-754 [upholding attorney fee award under Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 that included compensation for "109 minutes of computer research and 309.7 hours of work by three attorneys"]; and Trustees of Const. v. [read post]
