Search for: "Duffy v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 322
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
In the 1996 decision of R v Hinchey, the Supreme Court went through this offence in detail and provided a breakdown of exactly what the Crown needed to prove in order to get a conviction. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Janice Duffy has pursued the claim for six years, after being dismissed from her job at SA Health due to claims on the ‘Ripoff Reports’ website. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Marzen East Carolina University and Florida State University, SSRN. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 3:12 pm by Jon Sands
§ 2244(d)(1), while a Nevada state prisoner loses under equitable tolling.McMonagle v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 8:32 am by Eric Goldman
” * Seyfarth Shaw: Social Media Privacy Legislation state-by-state summary * K.W. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:29 am by Amy Howe
Finally, JURIST’s Jaclyn Belczyk covers Thursday’s decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:57 am by Amy Howe
Last Thursday’s ruling in POM Wonderful v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Consider it a replay of that old Hume v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 10:38 am by Sheppard Mullin
Smith and Ryan Duffy Last month, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit raised the stakes on what has become one of the most prominent topics in the labor law community in recent times with its 2-1 decision in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:34 am by Stephen Wermiel
On Wednesday, June 26, he shared his strong disagreement with the majority’s ruling striking down a portion of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 2:00 pm by Joe Mullin
The case is an Illinois state lawsuit making vague allegations over computer hacking against a defendant with a lawyer who some have said is actually in cahoots with Prenda. [read post]