Search for: "Duke Power Co. v. Daniels" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am by Steve Gottlieb
Duke Power Gun control Guns Guns Guns and demonstrations Gunslingers Hamas Hamas Happy holidays Harassment Hard-working Harm Harris v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am by Guest Author
 Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971) McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
SCOGGINS; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13-06-00368-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 12-20-07)08-0276 DANIEL ROEHRS, ET AL. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 8:15 am by Charles Casper
Archer Daniels Midland Co., 2013 SCC 58; computer software in Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
Property is quite useful for developing an understanding of the structures for managing the power to control and exploit things, principally real estate in the first year. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
Daniel Deacon & Leah Litman, The New Major Questions Doctrine, 109 Va. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
James Room)Panel 3: The Disciplinary State, 2:00-3:30Chair: Erin Braatz, Suffolk University Law School (ebraatz@suffolk.edu)Commentator: Lauren Benton, Vanderbilt University (lauren.benton@vanderbilt.edu)Stacey Hynd, University of Exeter (s.hynd@exeter.ac.uk) (Re-)Constructing Murder: Capital Punishment and the Criminalization of African Bodies in Colonial Ghana, c. 1890-1957Dior Konate, South Carolina State University (dkonate@scsu.edu) Imprisonment and Citizenship in Senegal, 1917-1946… [read post]
Some have argued that, because the Nation’s approach to climate change is politically contested,[1] and since these matters affect major policy questions over which Congress has not granted the SEC new, explicit powers, the Commission lacks authority to require disclosure in this area.[2] For the reasons given below, the Commission should disregard these claims, focusing instead on the challenging policy choices that any finalization of the proposal would require. [read post]