Search for: "Dukes v. Dukes" Results 21 - 40 of 3,906
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2023, 10:17 am by Michael Heise
Arti Rai (Duke) et al. take up this challenge in a recent paper, Molecular Diagnostics Patenting after Mayo v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
On 8 December 2023, judgment was handed down in The Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2023] EWHC 3120 (KB). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
On 1 December 2023, Mr Justice Jay handed down judgement in favour of the defendant in the case of Dyson v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am by Guest Author
 Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971) McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:21 am by centerforartlaw
So this was different from the troop of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, looting during the 16th century. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am by INFORRM
There was also a hearing in the case of Price v Newsquest Media Group. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by INFORRM
IPSO 19498-23 Newman v The Sunday Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 19587-23 Ward v The Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 19768-23 Bliss v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 20285-23 Khan v The Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 20455-23 Chafe v Knutsford Guardian, 12 Discrimination (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction:… [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
. 'Duke' Ealey,” a 1939 graduate of the Howard Law School. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am by INFORRM
The seven claimants bringing proceedings are: Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon OBE; Elizabeth Hurley; Sir Elton John CH CBE; David Furnish; Sir Simon Hughes; Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex; and Sadie Frost Law. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 2:35 am by centerforartlaw
In AWF v Goldsmith, the US Supreme Court clarified that not all works which add “new expression, meaning, or message”[15] will be considered ‘transformative’ by the law, since this would conflict with the copyright holder’s “exclusive right to prepare derivative works,” effectively rendering it useless. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm by bndmorris
The class spent the entire semester on United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
There was also a case management hearing before Nicklin J in the case of Daedone v BBC. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 8:00 am by Paul Caron
Tax Prof Amicus Briefs for the Government: John Brooks (Fordham), David Gamage (Indiana) Brian Galle (Georgetown), Cliff Fleming (BYU), Jacob Goldin (Chicago), Edward McCaffery (USC), Ajay Mehrotra (Northwestern), Richard Schmalbeck (Duke) Ari Glogower (Northwestern), David Kamin (NYU), Rebecca Kysar (Fordham), Darien Shanske (UC-Davis), NYU Tax Law Center Andy Grewal (Iowa)... [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 12:11 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The first, Lambert Simnel, a commoner who was crowned by Yorkist supporters as the supposed “King Edward VI,” and Perkin Warbeck, who pretended to the First Duke of York and the younger son of Edward IV. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am by INFORRM
On Wednesday 1 November 2023 there will be a CMC in the case of Daedone -v- BBC. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am by INFORRM
On the same days, there was a hearing in the case of Hemming v Poulton. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 2:00 am by Paul Caron
Zelenak (Duke; Google Scholar), Reading the Taxpayers’ Brief in Moore, 181 Tax Notes Fed. 101 (Oct. 2, 2023): In this article, Zelenak explains that the strategy of the taxpayers’ brief in Moore is to distinguish the mandatory repatriation tax from other provisions that arguably violate Eisner v. [read post]