Search for: "Dukes v. Dukes"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,918
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
On 1 December 2023, Mr Justice Jay handed down judgement in favour of the defendant in the case of Dyson v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am
Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971) McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:21 am
So this was different from the troop of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, looting during the 16th century. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
There was also a hearing in the case of Price v Newsquest Media Group. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
IPSO 19498-23 Newman v The Sunday Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 19587-23 Ward v The Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 19768-23 Bliss v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 20285-23 Khan v The Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 20455-23 Chafe v Knutsford Guardian, 12 Discrimination (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction:… [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 9:30 pm
. 'Duke' Ealey,” a 1939 graduate of the Howard Law School. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 11:43 am
Supreme Court to brief and argue Collins v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am
The seven claimants bringing proceedings are: Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon OBE; Elizabeth Hurley; Sir Elton John CH CBE; David Furnish; Sir Simon Hughes; Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex; and Sadie Frost Law. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 2:35 am
In AWF v Goldsmith, the US Supreme Court clarified that not all works which add “new expression, meaning, or message”[15] will be considered ‘transformative’ by the law, since this would conflict with the copyright holder’s “exclusive right to prepare derivative works,” effectively rendering it useless. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm
The class spent the entire semester on United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
There was also a case management hearing before Nicklin J in the case of Daedone v BBC. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:00 pm
It's a prosecutor-v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 6:32 pm
In United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
Tax Prof Amicus Briefs for the Government: John Brooks (Fordham), David Gamage (Indiana) Brian Galle (Georgetown), Cliff Fleming (BYU), Jacob Goldin (Chicago), Edward McCaffery (USC), Ajay Mehrotra (Northwestern), Richard Schmalbeck (Duke) Ari Glogower (Northwestern), David Kamin (NYU), Rebecca Kysar (Fordham), Darien Shanske (UC-Davis), NYU Tax Law Center Andy Grewal (Iowa)... [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 12:11 pm
The first, Lambert Simnel, a commoner who was crowned by Yorkist supporters as the supposed “King Edward VI,” and Perkin Warbeck, who pretended to the First Duke of York and the younger son of Edward IV. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am
On Wednesday 1 November 2023 there will be a CMC in the case of Daedone -v- BBC. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
On the same days, there was a hearing in the case of Hemming v Poulton. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 2:00 am
Zelenak (Duke; Google Scholar), Reading the Taxpayers’ Brief in Moore, 181 Tax Notes Fed. 101 (Oct. 2, 2023): In this article, Zelenak explains that the strategy of the taxpayers’ brief in Moore is to distinguish the mandatory repatriation tax from other provisions that arguably violate Eisner v. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm
On 16 and 17 October 2023, Steyn J will hear applications in the case of Donald Trump v Orbis Business Intelligence. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am
IPSO 18055-23 Rizwan v essexlive.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2021), 6 Children (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), No breach – after investigation 18056-23 Rizwan v walesonline.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), 6 Children (2021), No breach – after investigation 18057-23 Rizwan v getreading.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 6 Children (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), No breach – after investigation 14277-23 Booley v birminghammail.co.uk (Birmingham… [read post]
