Search for: "Dukes v. Dukes" Results 41 - 60 of 3,917
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2024, 5:50 am by Harold Hongju Koh
(Editor’s Note: This post – which shares thoughts with a keynote address published in 84 Ohio State L.J. 1125 (2024) – updates remarks delivered in Lviv, Ukraine, on Dec. 10, 2023, the 75th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, as the closing address at the American Society of International Law/Ukrainian Association of International Law Conference on Standing Tall for the Rule of Law in Ukraine.) [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:31 pm by Corynne McSherry
Unfortunately, a federal district court did just that in the latest iteration of Oracle v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 12:45 am by CAFE
 This is the second episode of a Stay Tuned miniseries, “AI on Trial,” featuring Preet Bharara in conversation with Nita Farahany, professor of law and philosophy at Duke University.Preet and Nita discuss the hypothetical case of a hotly-contested Senate race. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
And with good reason: It does not take a tasseographer to read the tea spilled on the leaves of Justice Kavanaugh’s Allen v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 12:01 pm by Paul Caron
Lawrence Zelenak (Duke; Google Scholar), The Income Tax, the Constitution, and the Unrealized Importance of Helvering v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am by INFORRM
As mentioned above, on the same day Fancourt J handed down judgment following the consequentials hearing in The Duke of Sussex v MGN. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
  There was the second phone hacking trial – again involving the Mirror Newspapers – with victory for the Duke of Sussex. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 29 January 2024, the consequentials hearing was heard following the judgment of The Duke of Sussex & Ors v MGN Ltd [2023] EWHC 3217 (Ch), handed down on 15 December 2023. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 3:12 pm by Adam White
Perhaps it will fix Chevron deference by recalibrating it to give more deference to steadier interpretations of law than to constant flip-flops, as it did to another category of judicial deference a few years ago in Kisor v. [read post]