Search for: "Duncan v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 757
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2010, 1:21 pm by Matthew Nelson
Despite the extensive fanfare surrounding the Michigan Supreme Court’s decision to hear Duncan v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 7:51 am
An assignment of a franchise agreement that is invalid under state law constitutes a constructive termination of a franchise in violation of PMPA.Here, because the franchise contracts had not been assigned nor had the plaintiffs received a notice of the assignment of their franchise contracts, there was no basis for the plaintiffs to allege that the defendants had violated PMPA. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
On Wednesday, the New Hampshire Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Duncan v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:43 am by Daniel Tokaji
Duncan/Jones Day Designated Professor of Law at Ohio State University Moritz College of Law and Senior Fellow at Election Law @ Moritz. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 4:34 pm by Jane Chong
Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557, 602 (2006) (plurality op.); Duncan v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Alice Woolley
In defending himself Duncan employed what Justice Rooke in Meads v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 7:44 pm by LTA-Editor
By Duncan Stark Blog Editor   On September 21, the Federal Circuit handed down its most recent Monsanto patent-related decision, Monsanto Company v. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 10:50 pm
If you want to help Duncan in this exciting adventure, email him here with news of the litigation in your jurisdiction.Right: chocks away, as Duncan "Biggles" Bucknell" flies off around the world to service his clientele's international interestsOther scorecards on Duncan's website list the current state of play in the US v Czech Budweiser dispute (here), Ranbaxy's battle with Pfizer over Lipitor (here) and the Eli… [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:30 am by Hannah Curtain & George Mallett
In McDonald v McDonald & Ors [2016] UKSC 28 the Supreme Court have confirmed that possession proceedings brought by private landlords are not subject to the same proportionality tests that apply to public sector proceedings. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 10:56 pm
  In this week's call, regular panelists Jeremy Phillips and Duncan Bucknell are joined by Peter Ollier, Don Zuhn and Ben Lehman to discuss: The Tom Tom and Microsoft case; Open source, Linux and the press; Recent patent reform proposals in Australia and comparisons with Europe and the United States; Tafas v Doll, Continuations and Rule 78; and Apportionment of damages in the current US patent reform bill. [read post]