Search for: "Duncan v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 350
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2016, 11:40 am by Andrew Hamm
United States is here; the transcript in Duncan v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 4:34 pm by Jane Chong
Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557, 602 (2006) (plurality op.); Duncan v. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 10:28 am by Nick Rosenkranz
United States, locating the treaty issue within the larger context of sovereignty and federalism. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 12:52 pm by Josh Blackman
Sobol fought the case all the way to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
J. 677 (2007).Subsidiarity and Religious Establishments in the United States Constitution, 52 Vill. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 11:35 pm
Contents include: Eirik Bjorge & Cameron Miles, Introduction William S Dodge, The Charming Betsy and The Paquete Habana (1804 and 1900) Michael Waibel, Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions (Greece v Great Britain) (1924–27) Chester Brown, Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland) (1927–28) Douglas Guilfoyle, SS Lotus (France v Turkey) (1927) Eirik Bjorge, Island of Palmas (Netherlands v United States of America) (1928) … [read post]
1 May 2018, 7:29 am by Danielle C. Quinn, Stephen P. Younger
”[29]  The Court determined that the purpose of the “Service of Suit Clause” was to assure insurance policy holders that the underwriter defendants would be amenable to suit in the United States.[30]  Because the clause at issue did not contain “mandatory language binding the parties to a particular forum,” the “submit to” jurisdiction language was insufficient to require that any litigation be brought in New York.[31] Although… [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 10:56 pm
  In this week's call, regular panelists Jeremy Phillips and Duncan Bucknell are joined by Peter Ollier, Don Zuhn and Ben Lehman to discuss: The Tom Tom and Microsoft case; Open source, Linux and the press; Recent patent reform proposals in Australia and comparisons with Europe and the United States; Tafas v Doll, Continuations and Rule 78; and Apportionment of damages in the current US patent reform bill. [read post]