Search for: "Dunn v. United States of America" Results 1 - 20 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2019, 8:54 pm by Bona Law PC
This hardly seemed fair, so the United States Supreme Court in the classic case of Illinois Brick v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
Editor’s Note: Eduardo Gallardo is a partner focusing on mergers and acquisitions at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 11:27 am by Dennis Crouch
In 2005, the Court granted certiorari on related issues in Laboratory Corp. of America v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am by Smita Ghosh
In the London Review of Books, but behind a paywall, are a review of Entick v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At the National Conference of State Legislatures’ blog, Lisa Soronen discusses McWilliams v. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
Hungar of the Washington office of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, with twenty minutes of time. [read post]
10 May 2007, 1:08 am
See also Markell, Amicus Curiae Brief in Favor of Respondent, Bank of America v. 203 North LaSalle Street Partnership, No. 97-1498, United States Supreme Court, October Term 1997 (filed August 17, 1998).But I'm still in search of another source: I could swear that somewhere in the work of Mr. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The prefatory language said: Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years… [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
As early as 2004, the National Military Strategy of the United States of America identified cyber attacks as a type of “asymmetric” threat that “may rely more on disruptive impact than destructive kinetic effects”. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Bollinger in 2003 upholding the University of Michigan Law School’s use of race to suggest that there is a clear time limit on the ability of governments in the United States to take race into account in university admissions. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
 United States of America, 2014 SCC 72 (35072) Nov. 14, 2014 Parliament has authorized the cross-border sharing of wiretap communications under s. 193(2) (e) of the Criminal Code, and the disclosure here was lawfully authorized by that provision, which taken as a whole, does not violate s. 8 of the Charter. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 8:31 am
It was said by the President of the United States, but at a private meeting, where I presume he, like many Presidents before him say "fuck" and other bad words all the time. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Section One straightforwardly provides: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Moving beyond the bare text, it is important, even (maybe especially) a hundred years later, to think more about what the Amendment really sought to constitutionally accomplish, and how its full import has not been deeply understood. [read post]