Search for: "Dykes v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 82
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2017, 7:37 am by Joy Waltemath
The court also denied the employer’s motion as to the employee’s retaliation claim, which was based on her alleged constructive discharge (Ellingsworth v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:49 am by Joy Waltemath
Although a financial adviser refused to name a coworker who allegedly said she was either a “dyke or a slut” because she was unmarried, a federal district court in New York found that her disclosure and refusal to work on his same floor could be protected “opposition” activity and denied an employer’s motion for summary judgment on her retaliation claims under Title VII and state law. [read post]
20 May 2014, 5:04 am by Stephen Page
It is actual reliance by the promisee, and the state of affairs so created, which answers the concern that equitable estoppel not be allowed to outflank Jorden v Money by dispensing with the need for consideration if a promise is to be enforceable as a contract. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:15 am by Erin Miller
Continuing our series of five-minute podcasts on oral argument days, we have two new podcasts below with counsel in McDonald v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 1:09 pm by Gene Quinn
On Tuesday, November 9, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in TiVo, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 7:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  As the Supreme Court has previously said, viewpoint discrimination is when the state is “attempting to give one group an advantage over another in the marketplace of ideas,” and that’s just not what the disparagement bar is. [read post]