Search for: "E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Train" Results 1 - 3 of 3
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2015, 3:00 am
”In answering the question, the Federal Court held that once an independent claim is found to be invalid, any dependent claim(s) which depend(s) on the invalid independent claim is / are also invalid because the dependent claim(s) cannot remain as dependent claim(s) anymore and the dependent claim(s) cannot be re-drafted or amended.In reaching the decision, the Federal Court appeared to have relied on the decision of the Federal Court of Australia in E I Du… [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am by Marie Louise
(IPKat) United States US General Interview with White House ‘IP Czar’, Victoria Espinel (PatLit) When a school boy’s trick meets strangers in a train (or in the Air) – trade secrets and strangers: E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v Christopher (IPKat) USPTO invites comments on strategic plan (IP Watch) (USPTO) US Patent Reform Unreasonable patent applicant delay and the USPTO backlog (Patently-O) US Patents June… [read post]