Search for: "EEOC v. Associated Dry Goods Corp"
Results 1 - 3
of 3
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2014, 6:02 am
Moreover, the employer was vicariously liable for the manager’s actions because, although it had an anti-discrimination policy, it had not met its burden of showing that it actually enforced it (EEOC v US Dry Cleaning Services Corp, June 4, 2014, Magnus-Stinson, J). [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
’’ Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:50 pm
Retail Credit Corp., 521 F.2d 1079 (4th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1087 (1976). [read post]
