Search for: "EEOC v. Houston Funding II, et al."
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2012, 9:22 am
Houston Funding II, Ltd., et al., Case No. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 8:48 am
Houston Funding II, [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:21 am
Houston Funding II Ltd. et al., the EEOC filed suit on behalf of an employee who allegedly was terminated after she asked her employer if she could use a breast pump to express milk in the workplace when she returned from maternity leave. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:21 am
Houston Funding II Ltd. et al., the EEOC filed suit on behalf of an employee who allegedly was terminated after she asked her employer if she could use a breast pump to express milk in the workplace when she returned from maternity leave. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:05 pm
Houston Funding II, Ltd, et al, (Civil Action No. 4:11-cv-02442) that “lactation is not pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:46 am
Houston Funding II, Ltd. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:59 am
Houston Funding II, Ltd., et al., Case No. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 4:01 pm
Houston Funding II, Ltd. et al., No. 12-20220, 2013 WL 2360114 (5th Cir. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 3:40 pm
Houston Funding II, et al., US 5th Cir. (5/30/13)Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Labor & Employment LawThe EEOC sued Houston Funding, alleging that Houston Funding unlawfully discharged one of its employees because she was lactating and wanted to express milk at work. [read post]
