Search for: "EEOC v. Trans World Airlines, Inc." Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2023, 6:42 am by zola.support.team
In short, the justices replaced the “de minimis” framework and the precedent set in Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Supreme Court in August, asking that it revisit its 1977 decision in Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 7:37 am
Trans World Airlines, Inc., 455 U.S. 385 (1982). allows a court to maintain jurisdiction over cases in which there has not been a timely filing with the EEOC. [read post]
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed, finding that the USPS had demonstrated that accommodating Groff’s objection to Sunday shifts imposed a burden on other workers and thus carried more than a de minimis cost, thereby satisfying a standard established by the Supreme Court more than 45 years ago in Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 12:02 pm
Trans World Airlines, Inc., 160 F.3d 442 (8th Cir. 1998) (airline customer service agent); Tyndall v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 7:07 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed based on the Court’s decision in Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 2:28 pm
Trans World Airlines, Inc., 160 F.3d 442 (8th Cir. 1998) (airline customer service agent); Tyndall v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 7:42 am by Mark Rienzi
” And second, the four justices also noted that the court had narrowly interpreted Title VII’s protections for religious workers seeking accommodations under Trans World Airlines Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
The second issue, however, may entice enough members of the Supreme Court to revisit its 1977 decision in Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Energy Safety Servs., Inc., No. 08-1013ADA - Whether driving is a major life activityo SCOTUS docket hereOakley v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" Tomorrow: An alternative—narrow, specifically defined exceptions for particular kinds of speech. [1] Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 6:34 am by Joy Waltemath
It found this to be consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in Zipes v Trans World Airlines, Inc., holding that “filing a timely charge of discrimination with the EEOC is not a jurisdictional prerequisite to suit in federal court, but a requirement that, like a statute of limitations, is subject to waiver, estoppel, and equitable tolling. [read post]