Search for: "EEOC v. United Parcel Service, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 64
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by John Elwood
Kent Recycling Services, LLC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm by John Elwood
Badr, 14-1440, (which was also rescheduled once) and Universal Health Services, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 1:23 pm by HRWatchdog
United Parcel Serv., Inc. (- U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 1338 (2015)) in March 2015. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:41 pm by Theodore T. Eidukas
The employee in the case was a part-time driver for United Parcel Service of America, Inc. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:58 am by Rachel Tischler and Brian DeShannon*
United Parcel Service, Inc., wherein the Court vacated the Fourth Circuit’s decision to affirm UPS’s successful motion for summary judgment. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 5:53 pm by Joel O'Malley
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 12-1226, which involves the extent to which employers must provide pregnant employees work accommodations provided to other non-pregnant workers with work limitations under the PDA. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am by Epstein Becker Green
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 12-1226, which poses whether the Pregnancy Discrimination Act requires an employer to accommodate a pregnant woman with work restrictions related to pregnancy in the same manner as it accommodates a non-pregnant employee with the same restrictions, but not related to pregnancy. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 12-1226, which poses whether the Pregnancy Discrimination Act requires an employer to accommodate a pregnant woman with work restrictions related to pregnancy in the same manner as it accommodates a non-pregnant employee with the same restrictions, but not related to pregnancy. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:33 am by Stuart M. Gerson
On October 2nd, the Supreme Court granted cert. in a Title VII religious accommodation case, EEOC v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 12:58 pm by Pamela Wolf
United Parcel Service, Inc., the Justices are asked to determine the extent to which employers must accommodate pregnant employees in light of accommodations extended to other workers. [read post]