Search for: "EEOC v. United Parcel Service, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 70
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 12-1226, which poses whether the Pregnancy Discrimination Act requires an employer to accommodate a pregnant woman with work restrictions related to pregnancy in the same manner as it accommodates a non-pregnant employee with the same restrictions, but not related to pregnancy. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 12:58 pm by Pamela Wolf
United Parcel Service, Inc., the Justices are asked to determine the extent to which employers must accommodate pregnant employees in light of accommodations extended to other workers. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am by John Elwood
United Parcel Service, 12-1226, involves a UPS employee who was not permitted to return to work when pregnant because her doctor said she should not lift objects over twenty pounds. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 5:27 am by Lorene Park
For example, in Rau v United Parcel Service, Inc, a federal district court granted summary judgment for an employer on all claims by a female UPS supervisor that depended on allegations that she was treated worse than her ex-boyfriend, who was also a UPS supervisor. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:41 pm by Theodore T. Eidukas
The employee in the case was a part-time driver for United Parcel Service of America, Inc. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 4:00 pm by Tawny L. Alvarez
United Parcel Service Inc., held that employers making accommodations for other similarly situated workers must provide a comparable accommodation for pregnant workers. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-474, involving former Virginia governor Bob McDonnell’s challenge to his fraud conviction; and Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm by John Elwood
Badr, 14-1440, (which was also rescheduled once) and Universal Health Services, Inc. v. [read post]