Search for: "ENGLAND v. STATE" Results 41 - 60 of 4,058
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2017, 5:40 pm by Andrews Thornton Higgins Razmara, LLP
For more information about the NECC case and exhibits from the Cadden trial, visit the United States Attorney’s Office District of Massachusetts website:  https://www.justice.gov/usao-ma/usa-v-cadden-et-al. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:13 am by sally
Regina (Cala Homes (South) Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (No 2) [2011] EWCA Civ 639; [2011] WLR (D) 187 “The fact that the government was going ahead with the abolition of regional planning strategies in England was a legitimate material consideration for those determining planning applications and appeals even though the existing statutory framework required that each region should have a regional strategy. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
In the case of R (P, G and W) and Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Anor [2019] UKSC 3 the Supreme Court upheld challenges to the legal regimes for disclosing criminal records in England and Wales, and Northern Ireland, finding them to be incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”). [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:48 am by Emma Cross
  [1] R (Barclay) v Secretary of State for Justice & Ors [2009] UKSC 9 [2] R (Barclay & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, The Committee for the Affairs of Jersey and Guernsey and Her Ma [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am by Peter Groves
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 3:53 pm
Approval of drugs by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) should not preempt any liability under state tort laws for pharmaceutical manufacturers, editors of the New England Journal of Medicine argue in a brief to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 2:02 pm
The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) has filed an amicus brief for the plaintiff opposing FDA preemption of state laws that provide a cause of action for inadequate warnings on drugs. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 10:05 am
CAAF has granted review in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 1:49 pm
On Blog 702, James England writes that the Colorado Supreme Court has confused Daubert jurisprudence in that state with its opinion this week.... [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 12:47 am
Here's a little curio, courtesy of the LexisNexis Butterworths Update service: it's Pocket Kings Ltd v Safenames Ltd and another [2009] EWHC 2529 (Ch), a 16 October 2009 decision of Michael Furness QC, sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court, England and Wales. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:59 am by sally
NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina [2011] UKSC 31; [2011] WLR (D) 220 “The Republic of Argentina was not entitled, by virtue of section 31 of the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982, to state immunity in respect of proceedings brought in England for the enforcement of a judgment obtained in New York. [read post]
18 May 2009, 10:46 pm
I know I’m missing some folks, but at a minimum we had trademark law bloggers and readers from France, Spain, England, China, Australia, New Zealand, Brazil, Germany, Canada, Finland, Switzerland, South Africa, the Netherlands, and many cities throughout the United States. [read post]