Search for: "ENGLAND v. STATE"
Results 141 - 160
of 4,062
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2023, 7:15 pm
The page in the brochure calls out that the data were also included in the New England Journal of Medicine. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
She previously authored The Legal History of the Presidential Management Fellows Program and Hansberry v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:50 am
If it meant only that it would be pointless to state it. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:41 am
A famous example occurred last year in ,Dobbs v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:03 am
See Douez v Facebook, Inc [2017] 1 SCR 751. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:41 pm
Athwal v State of Queensland [2023] QCA 156 considered the constitutionality of the prohibition under Queensland’s Weapons Act 1990 on bringing a kirpan into a school. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 4:37 am
Marcel Pemsel analysed the General Court’s judgment in Apart v EUIPO - S. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm
Via the Florida State University History Department: information about the Dr. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 7:41 am
In PACCAR Inc & Ors v Competition Appeal Tribunal & Ors, four out of five justices ruled that such agreements fall within the statutory definition of damages-based agreements (DBAs). [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 4:18 am
" Stone told him that he was "a New Englander, ... a Jew, and you are not a Democrat. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 1:00 am
In Ensygnia v Shell, Miss Charlotte May KC (sitting as Deputy Judge in the High Court of England and Wales) considered how a post-grant amendment which added the phrase that certain embodiments "fell outside the scope of the claims", might affect claim interpretation. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 6:38 am
The Court rejected the State Government’s arguments. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm
Last month, the Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit held a reenactment of the argument in United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm
Many officeholders in European monarchies bought their offices as part of a mutual bargain, and in return for their investment, their office was protected as property – especially in England. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am
The current state of the CSDDD already represents a milestone. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 11:49 am
The case name is G.P. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:59 pm
The United States proposed a broad product market including all shoes. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:44 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am
Forthcoming lecture on Aston Cantlow v Wallbank Aston Law School has organised a lecture by Mark Hill KC to be given at the parish church of St John the Baptist, Aston Cantlow, on Monday, 4 September, on Aston Cantlow v Wallbank [2003] UKHL 37, the leading case on chancel repair liability. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 1:59 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
