Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 7,356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2024, 11:11 am
Read the opinion The post JONATHAN ENGLISH v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 2:47 pm
The New Mexico Supreme Court in a recent ruling (State v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 10:40 pm
Court of Appeals in English v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 12:51 pm
As to English’s arguments regarding the indemnity scheme in the contracts, the court found that the interpretation was at least ambiguous enough that summary judgment was inappropriate, stating: While we are not prepared to settle conclusively these interpretation disputes at the summary judgment stage, English’s proffered interpretation is, at the very least. reasonable. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 10:24 am
I have had cases of the reluctant witness, typically the spouse physical abuse cases, to United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 10:24 am
I have had cases of the reluctant witness, typically the spouse physical abuse cases, to United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 12:15 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 7:30 am
On 17 April 2024, the Court of Appeal of the UPC handed down its decision concerning the language of proceedings in the (undoubtedly ground-breaking) case of Curio Bioscience v 10x Genomics. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 2:28 am
Regina (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice and Another Queen’s Bench Division “An English court would not make a declaration that existing national legislation was incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights where there was a ruling by a Scottish court in respect of the same or similar legislation and where the government was in [...] [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 8:06 am
The Times today reported a decision of Mr Justice Plender in the case of Stephen Cooper v Attorney-General (Judgment of 30 September 2008) in the English High Court (The Times, 7 October 2008, 'When judicial error in EC law gives rise to damages'). [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 5:44 am
An “English-only rule”, which requires employees to speak only English on the job, is only allowed if it is needed to ensure the safe or efficient operation of the employer’s business and is put in place for nondiscriminatory reasons.The EEOC has also stated that an "English only" rule may be justified by "business necessity. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 1:30 pm
(on the application of Axon) v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 10:42 pm
Charman v Charman, [2007] EWCA Civ 503. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 6:35 am
In Woodel v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 3:29 pm
The petitioner in Gamble v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 11:07 am
[i] Rosario v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 11:07 am
[i] Rosario v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 11:07 am
[i] Rosario v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:52 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:30 am
Recently, in Farias v. [read post]
