Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 7,259
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2013, 2:47 pm
The New Mexico Supreme Court in a recent ruling (State v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 10:40 pm
Court of Appeals in English v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 10:24 am
I have had cases of the reluctant witness, typically the spouse physical abuse cases, to United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 10:24 am
I have had cases of the reluctant witness, typically the spouse physical abuse cases, to United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 12:15 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 2:28 am
Regina (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice and Another Queen’s Bench Division “An English court would not make a declaration that existing national legislation was incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights where there was a ruling by a Scottish court in respect of the same or similar legislation and where the government was in [...] [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 8:06 am
The Times today reported a decision of Mr Justice Plender in the case of Stephen Cooper v Attorney-General (Judgment of 30 September 2008) in the English High Court (The Times, 7 October 2008, 'When judicial error in EC law gives rise to damages'). [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 5:44 am
An “English-only rule”, which requires employees to speak only English on the job, is only allowed if it is needed to ensure the safe or efficient operation of the employer’s business and is put in place for nondiscriminatory reasons.The EEOC has also stated that an "English only" rule may be justified by "business necessity. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 1:30 pm
(on the application of Axon) v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 10:42 pm
Charman v Charman, [2007] EWCA Civ 503. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 6:35 am
In Woodel v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 3:29 pm
The petitioner in Gamble v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 11:07 am
[i] Rosario v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 11:07 am
[i] Rosario v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 11:07 am
[i] Rosario v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:52 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:30 am
Recently, in Farias v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 2:06 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16; WLR (D) 81 “During the period from 1989 to 2000 price fixing was not illegal under English law so that it was not an extradition offence for the purposes of s 137 of the Extradition Act 2003. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:33 am
An English order can be sought only in respect of matters that could and would be ordered in English proceedings. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:39 am
French, Professor of Practice at Penn State Law, has published “English Justice for an American Company? [read post]
