Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 221 - 240
of 7,275
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2011, 7:14 am
The same kind of statutory interpretation issue arose in two of the other cases decided this week, United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 4:40 am
The English High Court had rejected the husband’s challenge and ordered maintenance to be paid by the husband. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 12:56 pm
The case of Ukraine v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 11:08 pm
English Translation of the Korean KIKO (currency option) injunction. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:14 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:42 am
Judiciary Law 487 is an attorney related statute that derives from one of the oldest English laws, carried over to New York statutes. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:58 am
” Mississippi v. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 6:48 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:10 am
State of Florida (2008). [read post]
10 May 2016, 11:20 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 7:22 am
We borrow a lot from British English in United States English but that doesn’t usually include the extra consonant in words. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:46 am
” Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Atlantic Marine Construction Co v United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, the appeals court noted that it plainly reaffirmed Bremen’s identification of a strong public policy supporting the enforcement of forum selection clauses. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 8:38 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) MacKreth (Deceased), R v [2009] EWCA Crim 1849 (08 September 2009) High Court (Administrative Court) Historic Buildings Monuments Commission for England (English Heritage) & Ors v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors [2009] EWHC 2287 (Admin) (17 September 2009) High Court (Technology and Construction Court) Tai Ping Carpets UK [...] [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 1:45 pm
United States ended its run today. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:49 am
The joint judgment in two separate claims against Google, is the first time the English courts have had to rule on the application of the ‘right to be forgotten’ principle following the decision in Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja Gonzalez (Case C-131/12). [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 12:46 am
The Court of Appeal has in Youell v La Reunion [2009] EWCA Civ 175 confirmed that, in light of the important West Tankers decision of the European Court of Justice, (see here) the arbitration exclusion to the Brussels I Regulation will be narrowly applied by the English courts. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:12 pm
” Méndez v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 7:57 am
In Sosa v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:09 am
Neither the parties nor the dispute had any connection with England or English law. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:59 am
This post may only make sense to English football fans. [read post]
