Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 261 - 280
of 7,346
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
In R (on the application of Naik) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2011] EWCA Civ 1546) the Court of Appeal confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful, and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 7:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 3:22 am
In September 2008 we reported on the advisory opinion of the Advocate General of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Allianz SpA v West Tankers regarding the English courts' ability to issue anti-suit injunctions in support of arbitration agreements. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 5:30 am
But the court, in adopting an expansive reading of a recent Supreme Court precedent, cautioned that the news publication might have a strong defense on the likelihood of confusion analysis (Punchbowl, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 12:41 am
At the outset of the hearing the Judge stated that his objection in the BMS case was directed to a paper application for the listing of the trial being made when the scope of the trial and in particular that there was another action to be joined to it, was not fully appreciated. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:07 am
Christopher Hutcheson (formerly known as KGM) v News Group Newspapers and others [2011] EWCA Civ 808 In these turbulent times for Rupert Murdoch (see the UK Human Rights Blog contempt post) it seems strange to see one of his newspapers being vindicated by the courts, but, for once, The Sun seems to have been on the side of the angels. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:45 am
The English courts should be even more wary of ruling on inter-religious disputes, the most obvious reason being that the organs of the state should not, and should not be seen to, privilege one religion over another. [read post]
2 May 2009, 9:57 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:34 am
In Faraday Reinsurance Co Ltd v Howden North America Inc & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 980, the Court of Appeal ruled that the judge at first instance, Judge Beatson, was entitled to conclude that English proceedings would serve a useful purpose when he refused to set aside a service out of the jurisdiction of negative declaratory proceedings by Faraday against Howden.In the Commercial Court decision, Beatson J refused to set aside the service because he found that the policy in… [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 12:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:01 pm
The marriage was not registered with the state authorities in Ukraine. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:40 pm
------- Title: United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:53 am
The issue in Michael Wilson Partners Ltd v John Forster Emmott [2008] EWCA Civ 184 was whether Mr Justice Flaux, at first instance, had acted correctly in authorising the disclosure, for the purposes of proceedings in New South Wales and the British Virgin Islands, of documents generated in an English arbitration. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 8:06 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 4:17 am
Let’s talk about today’s argument in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm
Let’s take a look at these new cases, in Plain English. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:48 am
Dunn is an English case that’s almost 120 years old. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:37 am
In State v Marquez, the NJ Supreme Court held that an individual arrested for DWI/DUI has the right to be informed of the consequences of refusing to consent (to submit) to an Alcotest (Breathalyzer) in the language that they speak. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 6:29 am
The ACLU's brief can be found online at: http://www.aclu.org/immigrants-rights/ling-v-state-georgia-amicus-brief. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 11:23 pm
State v. [read post]
