Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 381 - 400
of 6,392
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2014, 3:23 am
(My earlier Plain English coverage of the case is available here.) [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:20 pm
In Turner v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:39 pm
On August 3, 2011, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted a motion for the recognition of an arbitral award in the matter Continental Transfert Technique Ltd. v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:51 pm
In Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:25 pm
” He also referred to the Flood v Times case, on its way to the Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:19 am
In other big First Amendment news this week, the Court decided United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:52 pm
Co. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 2:32 pm
Anderson v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:40 am
Comment The decision of the majority sits uneasily with the position as it would be for other English citizens ordinarily resident in Northern Ireland, who seek treatment through the NHS for other illnesses. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 9:44 am
In Lachiri v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:05 am
In Chris v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
“Precarious” was not, in their Lordships’ view, “a term of art” and was similar but not identical to the guidance imparted in Jeunesse v Netherlands (2015) 60 EHRR 17 whereby family life was rendered precarious from the outset where those “involved were aware that the immigration status of one of them was such that the persistence of that family life within the host state would from the outset be precarious. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 10:13 pm
., the second sentence of the opinion is: "These consolidated cases show again why the ten most terrifying words in the English language may be, 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help you.'"Chief Judge Kozinski: A funny guy. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 9:31 pm
Interestingly, in its introduction, the Court stated: "We hold the provision is unconscionable and unenforceable under Armendariz v. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am
United Kingdom and previously held to be correct as a matter of international law by a number of American and English judges (Siderman de Blake v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:45 am
When the Court issued yesterday’s decision in Fisher v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
Even setting aside Bush v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 6:11 am
For example, let’s start off with Milner v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:38 am
The latest development is the English Commercial Court decision, West Tankers Inc v. (1) Allianz SpA and (2) Generali Assicurazione Generali SpA [2011] EWHC 829 (Comm). [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:53 pm
Last month, the SCOTUS ruled in Timbs v Indiana that a state's fine or forfeiture scheme may be excessive and thus unconstitutional under the 8th Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
