Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 381 - 400
of 6,443
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2023, 4:09 am
As I previously noted in People v Gobrick, 510 Mich 1029, 1029 (2022) (WELCH, J., concurring), “lexicographers and the authors of English style guides have long changed practices to reflect the evolution of the English lexicon. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 6:56 am
The English High Court dismissed the case, however ClientEarth was granted an oral hearing at the High Court to have it reconsider their dismissal. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
One could not confidently say the same of the United States. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 3:43 am
It is also questionable whether the Court was correct in stating that consumer perception will only be relevant in certain circumstances, when the CJEU stated at least twice in Louboutin (at least in the English translation – see paras 43 and 48) that it was ‘necessary’, in order to determine whether a marketplace operator makes ‘use’ of a sign, to assess consumer perception. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:48 am
"The Second Circuit held years ago (Haley v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
COVID-19 Pandemic Issues The Honorable Susan V. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 8:09 am
Smyth v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:51 am
The propaganda strategy is not meant for the state apparatus of competitor states. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am
(Please note that these figures do not include state court securities class action lawsuit filings.) [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:25 am
[Jalla v Shell International Trading and Shipping Co Limited [2023] UK SC 16] [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
Although we are in the English summer legal vacation there are still a number of media and law developments in this jurisdiction and abroad. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 11:11 am
The leading case on this subject in Pennsylvania is Hanrahan v. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 8:46 am
The case of State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 10:35 am
Volokh v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:03 am
Italy’s Minister of Culture Gennaro Sangiuliano echoed this sentiment, expressing appreciation for the ruling and stating that “[i]t must be said that the use for commercial purposes for cultural goods must be paid while it must be free for images for educational and study purposes. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 9:33 pm
V. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:25 am
From Mahmood v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 7:04 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 2:50 pm
From Tomlinson v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 11:35 am
This post is by Carlos Manuel Vázquez, a professor of law at Georgetown Law School. [read post]
