Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 421 - 440
of 7,351
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2011, 4:22 pm
In Virginia Office of Protection and Advocacy v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:51 pm
In Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:39 pm
On August 3, 2011, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted a motion for the recognition of an arbitral award in the matter Continental Transfert Technique Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 8:44 am
The plaintiffs failed to convince the court that the fee-splitting and class waiver provisions were unconscionable (Peng v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:23 am
(My earlier Plain English coverage of the case is available here.) [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:52 pm
Co. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 2:32 pm
Anderson v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:40 am
Comment The decision of the majority sits uneasily with the position as it would be for other English citizens ordinarily resident in Northern Ireland, who seek treatment through the NHS for other illnesses. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am
United Kingdom and previously held to be correct as a matter of international law by a number of American and English judges (Siderman de Blake v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 6:07 am
Section 23 of that UAA states the various ways in which an arbitration can be commenced. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:20 pm
In Turner v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:05 am
In Chris v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:22 pm
Challinor, The Decision of the English High Court in Rogers & Anor v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 9:44 am
In Lachiri v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:19 am
In other big First Amendment news this week, the Court decided United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
“Precarious” was not, in their Lordships’ view, “a term of art” and was similar but not identical to the guidance imparted in Jeunesse v Netherlands (2015) 60 EHRR 17 whereby family life was rendered precarious from the outset where those “involved were aware that the immigration status of one of them was such that the persistence of that family life within the host state would from the outset be precarious. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
Even setting aside Bush v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 10:13 pm
., the second sentence of the opinion is: "These consolidated cases show again why the ten most terrifying words in the English language may be, 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help you.'"Chief Judge Kozinski: A funny guy. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 9:31 pm
Interestingly, in its introduction, the Court stated: "We hold the provision is unconscionable and unenforceable under Armendariz v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:25 pm
” He also referred to the Flood v Times case, on its way to the Supreme Court. [read post]
