Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 481 - 500
of 7,346
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2012, 10:16 pm
At the end ofthe post, we stated that we were not convinced by the reasoning in the judgement. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day is United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:37 am
Monasky v. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 5:20 pm
First up is likely to be a challenge to the constitutionality of affirmative action, Fisher v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:54 pm
The reasoning of the CJEU in GAT v LuK was equally applicable here. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:01 am
Burwell in Plain English. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 4:55 am
The English courts have often given such clauses a fairly narrow construction. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 9:02 am
Unfortunately, the judgment is not yet available in English. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:30 am
In today’s case of the day, Myrtle v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 4:53 pm
The actions of the defendant will only constitute a refusal only if he was warned against it as stated in White v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 10:21 pm
The case at issue – Moore v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:19 am
Giving judgment striking out the Claimant’s privacy claim in Pryor v Liverpool Womens’ NHS Foundation Trust & Lumsden ([2021] EWHC 2911 (QB) [pdf]), Senior Master Fontaine, has confirmed that the English law of privacy has not progressed yet to there being a stand-alone tort of privacy. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:25 pm
The case was Cullen v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:30 am
Joseph V. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 5:08 am
" The tweet was written in Spanish, with the rough English translation, "Keep f***ing around and I'm gonna make you swallow your bitch words you f***ing whitey milks***tter (that's a homophobic slur). [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:04 am
(British Telecom & TalkTalk) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills.In the Scarlet case, the Advocate General issued an opinion against a Belgian court order requiring an ISP to block and filter material which is in breach of copyright. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Armour v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:37 am
Or stated another way “this court has no basis for declining jurisdiction”. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 2:55 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 12:47 am
Safenames, an English company, was contractually responsible for pointing the fulltiltpoker.com domain name towards Pocket Kings' domain name servers. [read post]
