Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 101 - 120 of 7,281
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2024, 10:40 am by Jeffrey Randa
That the petitioner has the ability and motivation to drive safely and within the law. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:06 am by Rob Robinson
That same year, in Caratube v Kazakhstan, confidential information was leaked from the Kazakh government’s IT system and the claimant eventually obtained some of the leaked documents. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 2:32 am by Rebekka Thomas (Bristows)
In this case, the complainant did no more than fill in the VeRO form, stating that it was the IP owner (or its agent), that it believed in good faith that the identified listings offered items which were not authorised by the IP owner or which were infringing the IP owner’s rights, and that it believed this declaration to be true and in accordance with English law. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 8:52 am by Samuel Bray
Palmer, especially since most state courts at the time went the other way (that note quotes from an article in the American Journal of Legal History by William Meyer, who has a very interesting forthcoming book on Riggs v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 2:40 am by jonathanturley
Judge Wendy Beetlestone just denied a critical motion to dismiss in De Piero v. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
De Piero … began working at Penn State Abington as a non-tenure-track Assistant Teaching Professor of English and Composition in 2018. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
An English trial of Warren Hastings weighed heavily on the forging of the impeachment standard. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 5:03 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
  A juror must be a United States citizen, a resident of the county in which the case is heard, at least 18 years old, able to communicate in the English language, physically and mentally capable of serving, and a non-felon (unless civil rights have been restored). [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 3:59 am by Susanne Gössl
This was to prevent individuals of English descent, residing in colonial territories for long periods, from solely accessing English law while also enabling others to access this law. 2. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm by Josh Blackman
"53 A study of the Corpus of Founding Era American English (COFEA) supports our position.54 The phrase "Officers of the United States" had no apparent "specialized meaning attached to its use. [read post]