Search for: "EQUITABLE ROYALTY CORPORATION v. STATE"
Results 41 - 56
of 56
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2011, 2:39 pm
Cir. 2009); · Limit inequitable conduct pleadings, Exergen Corporation v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 12:23 pm
GmbH v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 6:35 am
This approach of separating works into different categories and then applying different conditions within the categories could then be used much more equitably to suit the type of work and its potential for exploitation. [read post]
31 Oct 2020, 7:39 am
Schedule D of the tax return will tell us more about these assets and their sale Line 17 Rental Real Estate, Royalties, Partnerships, S-Corporations, Trusts, Etc. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:14 pm
ASCAP is a nonprofit music licensing organization that collects royalties for its members. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:36 am
This ISDS mechanism has been used – and sometimes abused – to permit foreign investors to challenge domestic state actions that constitute illegal expropriation, denial of justice, or denial of “fair and equitable treatment”. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:36 am
This ISDS mechanism has been used – and sometimes abused – to permit foreign investors to challenge domestic state actions that constitute illegal expropriation, denial of justice, or denial of “fair and equitable treatment”. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
, (Daily Dose of IP), 26 August: WIPO symposium on IP and multilateral agreements – Geneva: (IPKat), 11-12 September: US LSI: 4th annual conference on ‘Current issues in complex IP licensing’ – Philadelphia: (Patent Docs), 11 September/15 October: PLI seminar on developments in pharmaceutical and biotech patent law – New York/San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 15-16 September: UniForum & SAIIPL domain name ADR workshop – Centurion (South… [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 12:18 pm
Copyright: Baker v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 8:27 pm
The Su Âpreme Court's decision in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm
Here is the provision:Fair and equitable66.501 The Board shall fix royalty and levy rates and any related terms and conditions under this Act that are fair and equitable, in consideration of(a) what would have been agreed upon between a willing buyer and a willing seller acting in a competitive market with all relevant information, at arm’s length and free of external constraints;(b) the public interest;(c) any regulation made under subsection 66.91(1);… [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm
105 S.Ct. 2218 85 L.Ed.2d 588 HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC. and the Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., Petitionersv.NATION ENTERPRISES and the Nation Associates, Inc. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:56 am
The first injunction doesn't matter anymore because Motorola recently felt forced to accept an offer by Apple (which is not even based on a particular amount of money since the royalty rate will have to be set by a court of law) for taking a license to Motorola's wireless SEPs. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 11:53 am
Oracle v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
Going further, the Court announced its intention to appoint its own damages experts to testify at trial, stating: Judge Alsup relied on the authority of Monolithic Power Sys. v. [read post]
