Search for: "ESTELLE v. JUSTICE" Results 21 - 40 of 82
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2019, 5:14 am by Matthew D. Kaplan
As I noted in a blog last March, an 8-1 Supreme court ruling dating all the way back to 1976 (Estelle v Gamble) clearly established the right of prisoners to adequate medical care. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:37 pm by Orin Kerr
Justice Sotomayor would have construed the pro se petition liberally as making claim that Pitre had been punished for his refusal to take his medication: His pro se complaint and attachments thereto, “liberally construed,” Estelle v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 2:40 pm by Matthew D. Kaplan
“The standard of care that incarcerated people have a right to receive was established in the landmark case of Estelle v Gamble in 1976,” the magazine notes. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 10:15 am by Jordan Steiker
  Yes, the Court had announced that the right against self-incrimination applies in punishment as well as trial proceedings (Estelle v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:46 am by Jordan Steiker
Kentucky, the Court had held that a criminal defendant is entitled to a “no-adverse-inference” instruction at the guilt-innocence phase of a non-capital trial; in Estelle v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:27 am by Hadar Aviram
Estelle, the case that brought the Texan correctional monster to its knees. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:21 am by Ken White
Federal prosecutors generally must seek approval from "main Justice" — the Department of Justice in Washington D.C. [read post]