Search for: "Early v. Rogers"
Results 1 - 20
of 538
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Congressional and agency hearings in the early 1990s amplified some public concern, but in 1990, the Director of Cardio-Renal Drug Products, at the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, found several well-supported facts, based upon robust evidence. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In early 1996, Judge Jones invited briefing on expert witness challenges, and in face of the complex immunology and toxicology issues, and the emerging epidemiologic studies, he decided to appoint four technical advisors to assist him in deciding the challenges. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 7:01 pm
In Duncan v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:40 pm
From Judge Roger Benitez's decision in Fouts v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:44 am
The FBI and Capitol Police are investigating remarks reportedly made by Roger J. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 7:44 am
" The Court found a docket from the Illinois Commerce Commission ("ICC") in case number 19-0863, Roger Shekar v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
John Rogers says he is ready to fight the charges and seek another term in the Alabama Legislature. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
If the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Dobbs v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:32 am
The defendants asserted that the Supreme Court’s ruling in Dastar Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
He’s just gonna say he’s a winner… The Democrats, more of our people vote early that count. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 11:40 pm
The IPKat is pleased to host the following guest post by Katfriend Alessandro Cerri regarding the US Supreme Court’s decision in the Jack Daniel’s v VIP IP dispute. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
The Effect of Religious Statements in Financial Contracts, (June 9, 2023).Assaf Likhovski, Jurisprudence and Nationalism in the British Empire in the Early Twentieth Century: India, Egypt, and Palestine Compared, (The English Historical Review (Forthcoming).Roger Colinvaux, Strings Are Attached: Shining a Spotlight on the Hidden Subsidy for Perpetual Donor Limits on Gifts, (Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Forthcoming).Enda Hargaden & Nicolas Duquette, The U-Shaped… [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 4:13 am
One current example is the speech-protective test first articulated by the Second Circuit in Rogers v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
Concerns about the Rogers test. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 1:49 pm
Anderson, Anna Bower, Hyemin Han, Tyler McBrien, Roger Parloff, Stephanie Pell, Katherine Pompilio, Alan Z. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 4:52 am
Had the product been otherwise the same, but the branding focused prominently on the mark SILLY SQUEAKERS, VIP may have been able to avail itself of Rogers test to secure an early dismissal, even after this decision. [read post]
