Search for: "Early v. Rogers" Results 21 - 40 of 405
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2015, 3:36 pm by Andrew Hamm
This morning the Court announced its decision in King v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 12:23 pm
On another note, it may have proved helpful that a secondary work was created by a prominent and recognisable artist such as Andy Warhol and not by an ordinary Kat.Image credits: Andy Warhol, Cats and Dogs (Broadway), Early 1976 [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 12:34 am
Subscription-only service Lawtel has produced this today: it's Vestergaard Frandsen A/S, Vestergaard Frandsen SA and Disease Control Textiles SA v Bestnet Europe Ltd and others [2007] EWHC 2455 (Ch), a 25 October 2007 decision of Roger Wyand QC, sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court, England and Wales, concerning an application to strike out an action for breach of confidence. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 12:48 pm
Rogers Lumber Co., 173 P. 1046, 1048 (Okla. 1918) (“Statutes such as ours are said to have their origin in the common law rule of ‘journeys account’ ”); Baker v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 9:04 pm
The paper, which I wrote in conjunction with a November 2007 symposium at the Roger Williams University School of Law, basically argues that Swain v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:30 am by James Kachmar
  As a result, the Ninth Circuit was recently asked to revisit the test set forth in Rogers v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 6:25 am
When Chief Justice of the United States, Taney wrote the opinion for the Supreme Court in Dred Scott v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 3:21 pm by Walter Olson
In the early 1980s I had the honor to work for Antonin Scalia at the magazine Regulation, of which he was then editor. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am by Matthew Lanahan
Coverage and commentary focused on the five opinions that the Court issued yesterday; this blog’s round-ups of the early coverage of the decisions can be found here and here. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm by Florian Mueller
Judge Gonzalez Rogers is not prepared to decide on market definition, even on a preliminary basis, at this early stage--and she also notes that Epic focuses on harm to competitors so far, while any bottom-line impact on consumers under the rule of reason (where Apple could prevail by showing that what it does is ultimately good for consumers) would also need to be considered. [read post]