Search for: "Early v. Rogers"
Results 441 - 460
of 539
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2019, 10:26 am
Hours later, President-Elect Trump tweeted, ‘Great move on delay (by V. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am
ANA SILVA YANEZ, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
For example, I’ve long taught the fascinating case of Elkison v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 6:00 am
I'd like to think that our discussions were part of his early education, and not a bizarre form of child abuse!) [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In early 1996, Judge Jones invited briefing on expert witness challenges, and in face of the complex immunology and toxicology issues, and the emerging epidemiologic studies, he decided to appoint four technical advisors to assist him in deciding the challenges. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 8:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 10:13 am
Mandolfo, and Roger B. [read post]
25 May 2017, 1:08 pm
Like the trial court rulings, Chief Judge Roger Gregory’s opinion for the Fourth Circuit relies on the President Trump’s many campaign statements advocating a “Muslim ban,” as well as more recent statements by both the president and his advisers indicating that the first and second travel ban orders were outgrowths of this campaign agenda. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:07 am
v=4UO68IT1QIE) to encourage people to make electronic copies of things. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:49 pm
The case is captioned as Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 5:33 am
Various new restrictions on voting, which range from more stringent identification requirements to fewer registration opportunities to curbs on early voting, have been put in place. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm
The Educators had agreed at an early stage of those proceedings to a survey methodology that resulted in evidence that by their later admission “needs to be collected differently” in light of the 2004 CCH v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 5:37 pm
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Lucent's licensing expert, Roger Smith, argued for damages based solely on a running royalty rate. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 4:29 am
My thought: pursue the misuse arguments Posner offered in Ty v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 4:32 am
" The recent Gonzales v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 10:16 am
Sorrell v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the integrity… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the integrity… [read post]
