Search for: "Early v. Rogers" Results 441 - 460 of 534
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2015, 6:00 am by JB
  I'd like to think that our discussions were part of his early education, and not a bizarre form of child abuse!) [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  For example, I’ve long taught the fascinating case of Elkison v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 5:33 am by Jim Sedor
Various new restrictions on voting, which range from more stringent identification requirements to fewer registration opportunities to curbs on early voting, have been put in place. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:07 am by tekEditor
v=4UO68IT1QIE) to encourage people to make electronic copies of things. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:49 pm by Jennifer Simon, Esq.
  The case is captioned as Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 1:08 pm by Ilya Somin
Like the trial court rulings, Chief Judge Roger Gregory’s opinion for the Fourth Circuit relies on the President Trump’s many campaign statements advocating a “Muslim ban,” as well as more recent statements by both the president and his advisers indicating that the first and second travel ban orders were outgrowths of this campaign agenda. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Lucent's licensing expert, Roger Smith, argued for damages based solely on a running royalty rate. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm by Howard Knopf
  The Educators had agreed at an early stage of those proceedings to a survey methodology that resulted in evidence that by their later admission “needs to be collected differently” in light of the 2004  CCH v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 4:29 am
My thought: pursue the misuse arguments Posner offered in Ty v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm by Susan Landau
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the integrity… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm by Susan Landau
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the integrity… [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:23 am by John Gregory
One thinks of services like Napster and Grokster in the early years of this century. [read post]