Search for: "Early v. Rogers"
Results 81 - 100
of 534
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2021, 11:19 am
In Ake v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 8:24 am
Ragosta, A Wall Between Secular Government and a Religious People, 26 Roger Williams U. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 12:45 pm
In Brnovich v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
This is a guest post from law professor Michael Trebilcock and lawyer Dan Poliwoda: THE TRIPS VACCINE WAIVER CONTROVERSY* By Michael Trebilcock Emeritus University Professor of LawUniversity of Toronto Dan Poliwoda Lawyer, Dickinson Wright LLP University of Toronto (J.D., 2020) July 12, 2021 *We acknowledge the invaluable research assistance of Daniel Scarpitti, University of Toronto, Faculty of Law, 2L, in preparing these comments. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 2:00 am
The post <em>Wilson et al. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the integrity… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
This group—along with well-known lawyers, Paul Marshall and Stephen Mason, an academic criminal lawyer, Jonathan Rogers, a software testing and auditing expert, James Christie, and a statistician, Martin Newby—adapted for the public advice that had been requested by the UK Ministry of Justice; this included, "In principle, the threshold for rebutting the presumption so that the onus of proof is upon the party relying upon a document to prove it, and thus prove the integrity… [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
The genteel posturing of his early writings becoming shriller and more explicitly pro-slavery in later appearances. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
For example, I’ve long taught the fascinating case of Elkison v. [read post]
27 May 2021, 5:45 am
In Snow Phipps v. [read post]
22 May 2021, 7:12 am
The inflection point in the early phase of the trial was the testimony of Lori Wright, a Microsoft Xbox exec. [read post]
21 May 2021, 5:54 am
Eddy, and Sabastian V. [read post]
14 May 2021, 12:30 pm
In 1994 (pre-Lawrence v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 12:44 pm
That same day the court also decided in Minoru Yasui v. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 8:00 am
Peeler v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 7:25 pm
In this case, however, Judge Gonzalez Rogers expects to be able to hear Epic Games v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 1:01 pm
We have already elsewhere and repeatedly developed substantial evidence involving: [i] Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton's 1793 financial statement, prepared in response to a Senate order, which was itself issued under statutory authority; [ii] President Washington's accepting and keeping presents from foreign governments, absent congressional consent; [iii] the first Congress' statutory drafting conventions; [iv] as well as early scholarship. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 10:12 pm
Especially after I heard Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers (Northern District of California) tell counsel for Epic and Apple that the key issues in the case wouldn't be decided at that early stage, I wanted to take my time to understand. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 9:30 pm
The EU social partners have the “right of the firstborn” (as the late Roger Blanpain called it) to create EU Law. [read post]
