Search for: "Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. Mine Workers" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2013, 4:23 pm by John H Curley
 The Court initially noted that the parties' cba did not require a penalty of termination in these circumstances, and observed that the District did not have a zero tolerance policy.The Court also rejected a suggestion that the award violated public policy, concluding: The ... determination that reinstatement with conditions was the appropriate penalty did not violate public policy (see Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v Mine… [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:06 am by John H Curley
United Mine Workers, found no violation of public policy in the arbitrator’s award. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 6:54 pm
Supreme Court case Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
—Rick Callahan, The Associated Press, December 22, 2009 Duke Energy Corp. will spend about $93 million to settle clean air violations at a coal-fired power plant in southern Indiana where unauthorized changes significantly boosted air pollution, the federal government said Tuesday. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm by Steven M. Taber
Great Lakes Container Site. – EPA News Release, July 14, 2010 Twenty-six parties have agreed to help clean up the Great Lakes Container Corp. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by smtaber
Army Corps of Engineers violated federal environmental laws by failing to give the public enough of a say before issuing permits for mountaintop removal coal mines in West Virginia, a federal judge ruled Tuesday. [read post]