Search for: "Eastern Transportation Co. v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 77
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2011, 2:04 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 5:58 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States District Court, Eastern District, Marshall Division, issued an opinion on June 27, 2018, that discusses the law regarding the above title. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 6:21 am by Joy Waltemath
Under a proposed settlement agreement filed with the court Monday, April 21, giant truckload carrier Swift Transportation Company would pay $4.4 million to resolve class allegations that it violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act in its handling of criminal background checks for online applicants (Ellis, III v Swift Transportation Co of Arizona, LLC, ED VA). [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 7:00 am by Sarah Grant
Judge Spath also discussed the path forward on deciding the admissibility of statements, including those of convicted co-conspirator Jamal al-Badawi, marred by reports of torture by the Yemeni government. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 11:08 am by Rick St. Hilaire
  Alshdaifat was also charged with money laundering conspiracy, smuggling goods into the United States, and fraudulent importation and transportation of goods. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 10:31 am by Amaryah K. Bocchino
Robreno, in the Multi-District Litigation for asbestos in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, issued a significant opinion in which he held that an employer and/or premises owner does not owe a duty “to an employee’s spouse to warn or take measures to protect against take-home exposure to asbestos under Pennsylvania law” Gillen v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:15 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
District Court for the Eastern District of New York ruled against the defendants "with the exception that the United States shall, by May 25, 2012, identify any regulations, treaty provisions, or foreign laws it will rely on at trial as 'laws' in connection with the charge that defendants 'fraudulently or knowingly import[ed or brought] into the United States, any merchandise, contrary to law' in violation of 18 USC 545."18 USC 545 is the federal… [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 1:24 pm by Daniel Ingersoll
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York entered an order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2).  [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 10:24 am
CSX Transportation, Inc., et al., C.A. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 5:42 am by Emma Broches, Julia Solomon-Strauss
His co-conspirators remain in foreign custody in Pakistan and the Philippines pending proceedings for extradition to the United States. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 8:36 am by Spencer King
Gulf Oil Corp. to determine whether a contract is maritime or non-martime, and adopted a simplified two-part analysis, based on the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 9:02 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> State of Veracruz v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:56 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
The agent also stated that lying about the country of origin on customs documents constitutes a material false statement in violation of the federal criminal code, citing United States v. [read post]