Search for: "Eastern Transportation Co. v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 111
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
The term “vessel” is defined by the United States Code to include “every description of watercraft or other artificial contrivance used, or capable of being used, as a means of transportation on water. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 1:24 pm
These together define a means of declaring law that remains influential in the United States. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 11:08 am
Alshdaifat was also charged with money laundering conspiracy, smuggling goods into the United States, and fraudulent importation and transportation of goods. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:19 am
Other notable interstate pipelines include those developed by ANR Pipeline Co., Centerpoint Energy Gas Transmission Co., Mississippi River Transmission Corp., Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Co., and Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:15 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of New York ruled against the defendants "with the exception that the United States shall, by May 25, 2012, identify any regulations, treaty provisions, or foreign laws it will rely on at trial as 'laws' in connection with the charge that defendants 'fraudulently or knowingly import[ed or brought] into the United States, any merchandise, contrary to law' in violation of 18 USC 545. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:04 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
Co., 543 U.S. 481, 497 (2005). [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/SU6 United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:56 pm
The agent also stated that lying about the country of origin on customs documents constitutes a material false statement in violation of the federal criminal code, citing United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 7:14 am
In 1927 the United States Supreme Court decided Robins Dry Dock and Repair Co. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 6:05 am
Transport of hazardous materials is strictly regulated by the U.S. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
Those inspections noted several violations of the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), which regulates the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 1:51 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, recently was called on to interpret an insurance policy and to determine whether or not the facts of a claim implicated coverage in the policy at issue. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
The $4 million civil penalty will be divided among the United States, Alabama and Iowa. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
