Search for: "Eastern Transportation Co. v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2012, 4:15 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of New York ruled against the defendants "with the exception that the United States shall, by May 25, 2012, identify any regulations, treaty provisions, or foreign laws it will rely on at trial as 'laws' in connection with the charge that defendants 'fraudulently or knowingly import[ed or brought] into the United States, any merchandise, contrary to law' in violation of 18 USC 545. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 1:14 pm
The applicant accepted the expert opinion on the majority of the SARs mentioned in the permit, but questioned the position in relation to the Butler’s Gartersnake, Eastern Foxsnake and Colicroot. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:04 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
Co., 543 U.S. 481, 497 (2005). [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/SU6 United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:56 pm
The agent also stated that lying about the country of origin on customs documents constitutes a material false statement in violation of the federal criminal code, citing United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 7:14 am
In 1927 the United States Supreme Court decided Robins Dry Dock and Repair Co. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 6:05 am
Transport of hazardous materials is strictly regulated by the U.S. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
Those inspections noted several violations of the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), which regulates the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 1:51 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, recently was called on to interpret an insurance policy and to determine whether or not the facts of a claim implicated coverage in the policy at issue. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
The $4 million civil penalty will be divided among the United States, Alabama and Iowa. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
District Court in Eastern Washington. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
– Times-News, April 27, 2010 Feedlot co-owner Cory King and the other defendants charged by the state with more than 20 environmental violations have reached a settlement, defense attorneys announced today. [read post]
