Search for: "Ed Felten" Results 41 - 60 of 197
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2014, 3:29 am by englehardt
Thanks to Joseph Bonneau and Ed Felten for their helpful comments. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 11:00 am by Wells Bennett
While NIST’s Committee of Visitors recommended increasing NIST’s cryptographic expertise, and Professor Ed Felten recommended increasing CSD’s budget, specifics were lacking. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 4:27 am by Arvind Narayanan
” In a response to this piece, Ed Felten and I point out eight of our most serious points of disagreement with Cavoukian and Castro. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 11:32 am by Joseph Bonneau
This was joint work with Jeremy Clark (Concordia University), Ed Felten, Joshua Kroll, Andrew Miller (University of Maryland), and Arvind Narayanan. [1] We aren’t even considering here the challenge of events with a legitimate real-world dispute over the outcome, such as 2012 Iowa Republican caucuses. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:05 am by Steve Schultze
As it happened, David Robinson, Harlan Yu, Bill Zeller, and Ed Felten had recently written their paper “Government Data and the Invisible Hand“, arguing that: …the executive branch should focus on creating a simple, reliable and publicly accessible infrastructure that exposes the underlying data. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 6:51 am by Arvind Narayanan
Thanks to Joseph Bonneau and Ed Felten for reviewing a draft. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 4:15 am by Jeremy Epstein
Ed Felten provides good advice on this blog about what to do in the wake of Heartbleed, and I’ve read some good technical discussions of the technical problem (see this for a particularly understandable explanation). [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 8:13 am by Ed Felten
Consider Tuesday’s Washington Post op-ed by Mark Thiessen. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 10:20 am by Sabrina I. Pacifici
In a declaration for the ACLU, Ed Felten noted: “Although officials have insisted that the orders issued under the telephony metadata program do not compel the production of customers’ names, it would be trivial for the government to correlate many telephone numbers with subscriber names using publicly available sources. [read post]
As Ed Felten explains, “The easiest way to protect users against this threat is to refrain from tracking. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 11:05 am by Trevor Timm
Princeton technologist Ed Felten, who previously at the Federal Trade Commission, best explained why the NSA revelations could end up hurting US businesses: “This is going to put US companies at a competitive disadvantage, because people will believe that U.S. companies lack the ability to protect their customers—and people will suspect that U.S. companies may feel compelled to lie to their customers about security. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 11:52 am by Arvind Narayanan
Our own Ed Felten weighed in with a detailed analysis, refuting the paper’s claim that a coalition of “selfish miners” will grow in size until it controls the whole currency. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 9:16 am by Brian Pascal
Computer scientist and chief technologist at the FTC Ed Felten predicted much of the current state of affairs in 2006, and security expert Bruce Schneier has been making similar points for over a decade. [read post]
5 May 2013, 11:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Andrea Matwyshyn, Hacking Speech: Informational Speech and the First Amendment Discussant: Felix Wu  Bomb-making and other informational speech: disclosure of security vulnerabilities. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 9:50 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Felten's post is worth reading in full. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 12:02 pm by Paul Caron
Wall Street Journal op-ed: How the Taxman Cleared the Dance Floor, by Eric Felten (Eric Felten Jazz Orchestra): These are strange days, when we are told both that tax incentives can transform technologies yet higher taxes will not drag down the economy. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 1:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  As Ed Felten said, many legitimate security researchers now just stay away from DRM because going back every eighteen months—for a triennial exemption—is just too burdensome. [read post]