Search for: "Eddings v. Oklahoma" Results 241 - 260 of 379
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2014, 12:32 pm by Lovechilde
  Indeed, Andrew Cohen notes, just  few months ago, Justice Scalia, during oral argument in Hall v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 6:28 am by Joy Waltemath
One testified that he “butt[ed] heads” when the territory managers were required to make changes to their territories. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 8:13 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 40889 (WD OK, March 27, 2014), an Oklahoma federal district court adopted in modified form a magistrate's recommendations (2014 U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Army), Picking Up where Katcoff Left Off: Developing a Framework for a Constitutional Military Chaplaincy, 66 Oklahoma Law Review 245-286 (2014).Tung Yin, Were Timothy McVeigh and the Unabomber the Only White Terrorists? [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Bartrum, The Curious Case of Legislative Prayer: Town of Greece v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 9:24 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 25128 (WD OK, Feb. 27, 2014), an Oklahoma federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2014 U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 1:00 am by Jason Rantanen
By Sarah Burstein, Associate Professor of Law at the University of Oklahoma College of Law Pacific Coast Marine Windshields, Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 10:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 150601 (WD OK, Oct. 21, 2013), an Oklahoma federal district court ordered the Oklahoma Department of Corrections to respond within 14 days to an Orthodox Jewish inmate's suit to hold authorities in contempt for not fully complying with a 2006 injunction ordering them to provide plaintiff with a kosher diet.In Barfell v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 6:42 am by Amy Howe
This blog’s symposium on McCutcheon v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:49 pm by Gregory Forman
Baby Girl and “remand[ed] the case for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:38 am by Allison Trzop
Herrmann, United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Oklahoma Coalition for Reproductive Justice 12-1094Issue: Whether the Oklahoma Supreme Court erred in holding – without analysis or discussion – that the Oklahoma law requiring that abortion-inducing drugs be administered according to the protocol described on the drugs’ FDA-approved labels is facially unconstitutional under Planned Parenthood v. [read post]