Search for: "Eddings v. Oklahoma" Results 121 - 140 of 343
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2011, 12:28 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 97706 (WD OK, Aug. 31, 2011), an Oklahoma federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendations (2011 U.S. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 7:14 am by Kiran Bhat
In an op-ed for The National Law Journal, Robert Johnson discusses a brief filed by a group of current and former prosecutors in Chaidez v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:43 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 44420 (ED OK, March 29, 2012), a Seventh-day Adventist inmate sought a vegan religious diet. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed for Law360 (subscription required), Jay Lapeyre weighs in on patent case WesternGeco LLC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:52 am by Suzanne Ito
Oklahoma: Ryan Kiesel, the ACLU of Oklahoma's Executive Director, penned an op-ed in the Oklahoma Gazette explaining why a pending reform law falls short of expectations [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 4:53 am by Amy Howe
United States and Zivotofsky v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 5:27 am by Amy Howe
Burwell and Obergefell v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Oklahoma, “the appeal of a man convicted of child sex crimes who contends he should not have been tried in an Oklahoma state court. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 4:44 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary on the ruling comes from Deborah LaFetra in an op-ed at the Daily Journal. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 5:31 am by Amy Howe
In Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Glossip v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
I just don't see how to square the circle.On the other hand, we have newer models like Direct Primary Care and facilities like the Surgery Center of Oklahoma, which operate on a strictly cash basis, no insurance needed (or, in fact, accepted). [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
  Soon afterwards, the states of Texas, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, and Nebraska filed suit, arguing that the definition that the actuarial group adopted “foist[ed] nearly $500 million of taxes” onto the states in just three years because of a fee that the Affordable Care Act imposed (but which was repealed in 2019). [read post]