Search for: "Ede v. Hahn" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2018, 1:06 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Hahn has an op-ed in the WaPo, titled "Many mocked this Scott Pruitt proposal. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 6:56 pm by Gene Takagi
First, we heard closing args in the Fairbairn v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 3:35 pm by Sean Wajert
Second, with regard to strict liability, it was unclear to the panel whether and in what circumstances an implantable medical device like the filter is subject to strict liability under Hahn v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 5:29 am
This focused on the three-step test of the Eli Lilly v Actavis UK Supreme Court decision and the subsequent UK cases applying that  test. [read post]
1 May 2019, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“[W]hat is important is when the malpractice was committed, not when the client discovered it” (Hahn v Dewey & .LeBoeuf Liquidation Tr., 143 AD3d 547, 547 [1st Dept 2016] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 4:06 am by Sean Wajert
Revenue Management Corp., 169 F.3d 1057, 1060-61 (7th Cir. 1999); see also Hahn v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 11:24 am
”  Largely as a result of concerns over liability for scientifically undiscovered risks (something the Supreme Court never really had to address), in Hahn v. [read post]