Search for: "Edelman v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2016, 5:37 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
 Pauma Band of Luiseño Mission Indians of the Pauma and Yuima Reservation: Cal v Pauma Cert Petn Question presented: In Edelman v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 2:04 am by Peter Mahler
A recent decision by a Manhattan trial judge in Holdrum Investments, N.V. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 9:56 am by Anna Christensen
Below, Will Edelman of Stanford Law School recaps yesterday’s ruling in Carr v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:49 pm by Josh Wright
  By way of contrast, today’s antitrust analysis of alleged exclusionary conduct begins with (ironically enough) the U.S. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 3:23 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
  By way of contrast, today’s antitrust analysis of alleged exclusionary conduct begins with (ironically enough) the U.S. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 6:13 am by Eugene Volokh
The case, filed by, among others, lawyer and FIRE co-founder Harvey Silverglate, is Edelman v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Edelman v Poster ;  2010 NY Slip Op 00788 ;  Decided on February 4, 2010 ;  Appellate Division, First Department  we see a situation in which a matrimonial retainer agreement boldly stated a right to arbitrate, yet the Appellate Division, First Department, determined that client has no right to arbitrate. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 10:32 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Thys, contemplate the following from Monell, 436 U.S. 658, 695 (1978) :Although we have stated that stare decisis has more force in statutory analysis than in constitutional adjudication because, in the former situation, Congress can correct our mistakes through legislation, see, e. g., Edelman v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Specifically, defendants’ receipt and retention of plaintiff’s accounts, without objection within a reasonable time, and agreement to pay a portion of the indebtedness, gave rise to an actionable account stated, thereby entitling plaintiff to summary judgment in its favor” (Rosenman Colin Freund Lewis & Cohen v Edelman, 160 AD2d 626, 626, 559 NYS2d 249 [1st Dept 1990]). [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Edelman v Berman  2021 NY Slip Op 04120 Decided on June 30, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department presents an interesting real estate legal malpractice claim. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, 56 AD3d 1, 13 [1st Dept 2008]).Defendants are not entitled to summary judgment on their account stated counterclaim, as their claim for legal fees is intertwined with plaintiffs’ legal malpractice claim. [read post]