Search for: "Edith Roberts" Results 81 - 100 of 153
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2013, 6:51 am by Marissa Miller
 In addition, the firm’s Tejinder Singh was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by international human rights advocates in support of the respondents in Perry, while the firm’s Kevin Russell was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in Windsor. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:42 am by Dan Stein
Perry; the firm’s Kevin Russell was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Perry; Kevin Russell of the law firm Goldstein & Russell, P.C. was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am by Allison Trzop
Perry; the firm’s Kevin Russell was among the counsel on an amicus brief filed by former senators in support of Edith Windsor in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:53 pm
Edith Windsor and Thea Spyer were a same-sex couple who lived together as partners in New York for many years. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:21 am by Mark Ashton
But the dissenting opinions of Justices Roberts, Alito and Scalia note that there are profound procedural and substantive defects with the reasoning of the majority opinion. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Edith Windsor challenged the estate tax assessment on the ground that the federal-law provision of DOMA was unconstitutional. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:58 pm by Amy Howe
  That conclusion (and the steps that the Court took to get there) drew the ire of the Court’s four more conservative Justices – Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito – who filed three separate dissenting opinions totaling nearly fifty pages. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 9:52 am by Alena Wolotira
The Defense of Marriage Act prevented Petitioner Edith Windsor from benefiting from the surviving spouse provisions of federal estate tax law. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 3:26 pm by Howard Friedman
Chief Justice John Roberts authorizing the transfer, and indicating that he had received a request on June 7 from the 5th Circuit for the transfer. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 6:04 am by Staci Zaretsky
Uh oh, that’s serious business if Roberts is involved. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 8:12 am by stu@crimapp.com
The judicial ethics Complaint against US Court of Appeals Judge Edith Jones was transferred to the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia pursuant to an order of Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:31 am by constitutional lawblogger
Windsor challenging the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act, DOMA, Chief Justice Roberts expressed skepticism that gays and lesbians were politically powerless, announcing to Roberta Kaplan, representing Edith Windsor, "As far... [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 11:14 am
Roberts and Scalia seemed most interested in this sort of outcome. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
BLAG’s First Bad Argument: Marriage as a Tool to Address Accidental Procreation Plaintiff Edith Windsor challenged DOMA Section 3 as denying equal protection of the laws to members of same-sex couples whose marriages are recognized under state law, but denied legal effect by federal law. [read post]