Search for: "Edwards v. Arthur Andersen" Results 21 - 40 of 104
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Rule of Reasonableness: Non-Compete Provisions in California Business Contracts
13 Aug 2020, 1:55 pm by James Kachmar
The California Supreme Court in the 2008 case, Edwards v. [read post]
IP Law Blog - http://www.theiplawblog.com/
California Supreme Court Applies Rule of Reason Test for “Business Only” Restrictive Covenants
13 Aug 2020, 1:41 pm by James Goodman
In Edwards v Arthur Andersen (2008), 44 Cal 4th 937, the Court, in the employment context, held there was no limited restraint exception to § 16600 and rejected any reasonability analysis. [read post]
Trade Secrets and Noncompete Blog - http://www.tradesecretsnoncompetelaw.com/
California Rarely Enforces Non-Compete Clauses Against its Residents and Sometimes Won’t Even Enforce Out-of-State Forum Selection and Choice-of-Law Clauses
15 Jun 2020, 9:26 am by Bona Law PC
NuVasive, Inc. v. [read post]
The Antitrust Attorney Blog - http://www.theantitrustattorney.com/
Ninth Circuit Seeks Guidance From California Supreme Court on Business to Business Non-Competes
23 Mar 2020, 11:05 am by Robert B. Milligan, Lauren Leibovitch and Miguel Ramirez
Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal. 4th 937, 946-47 (2008). [read post]
Trading Secrets - http://www.tradesecretslaw.com/
Ninth Circuit Inquiry on Non-Competes Could Have Huge Implications
8 Aug 2019, 10:00 am by James Kachmar
”  In 2008, the California Supreme Court, in Edwards v. [read post]
IP Law Blog - http://www.theiplawblog.com/
Considerations for non-competition and non-solicitation agreements in California
21 Jun 2019, 2:23 pm by Anthony Zaller
California Supreme Court ruling in Edwards v. [read post]
California Employment Law Report - http://www.californiaemploymentlawreport.com/
California Courts Nix Non-Solicitation Clauses in Employment Agreements
6 Mar 2019, 6:48 am by Nassiri Law
In the 2008 case of Edwards v. [read post]
Orange County Employment Lawyers Blog - http://www.orangecountyemploymentlawyersblog.com/
Employee Non-Solicitation Provisions under Attack
28 Feb 2019, 9:05 am by James Kachmar
Arthur Andersen decision. [read post]
IP Law Blog - http://www.theiplawblog.com/
Time to reconsider California employee non-solicitation provisions
13 Feb 2019, 1:33 pm by Michele Haydel Gehrke and Michael Kleinmann
In 2008, the California Supreme Court in Edwards v. [read post]
Employment Law Watch - http://www.employmentlawwatch.com/
Second Court Calls into Question Viability of Employee Non-Solicitation Agreements
4 Feb 2019, 8:15 am by James Goodman
Arthur Andersen LLP (2008) 44 Cal. 4th 937. [read post]
Trade Secrets and Noncompete Blog - http://www.tradesecretsnoncompetelaw.com/
California Court of Appeal Questions Continuing Viability of Employee Non-Solicitation Agreements
15 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by James Goodman
In its 2008 landmark decision Edwards v. [read post]
Trade Secrets and Noncompete Blog - http://www.tradesecretsnoncompetelaw.com/
California Court of Appeals Casts Doubt on Continued Validity of Employee Non-Solicitation Provisions
13 Nov 2018, 12:32 pm by Michael Weil
Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal. 4th 937 (2008), which rejected a “reasonableness” standard when applying Section 16600. [read post]
Employment Law and Litigation - http://blogs.orrick.com/employment/
Most Employee Non-Solicitation Agreements Are Not Enforceable In California
2 Nov 2018, 10:05 am by Arkady Itkin
Arthur Andersen LLP (2008). [read post]
San Francisco Employment Law Firm Blawg - http://www.sanfranciscoemploymentlawfirm.com/
Hidden Pitfalls of Old Non-Compete Provisions
21 Aug 2015, 10:23 am by James Kachmar
Arthur Andersen, LP, 44 Cal.4th 937 (2008).) [read post]
IP Law Blog - http://www.theiplawblog.com/
Ninth Circuit Broadens California Rule Against Non-Competes
21 Apr 2015, 9:06 am by <a href='http://gtlaw.com/People/Kurt-A-Kappes'>Kurt Kappes</a>, <a href='http://gtlaw.com/People/JamesNelson'>James Nelson</a> and <a href=''>Michelle L. DuCharme</a>
Arthur Andersen, LLP (Edwards), 189 P.2d 285 (Cal. 2008). [read post]
GT L&E Blog - http://www.gtleblog.com/
Partner Departures and Golden v. California Emergency Physicians Medical Group: Does California’s Business and Professions Code § 16600 Void Any Partnership Provision that Restricts a Departing Partner’s Right to Compete?
20 Apr 2015, 11:37 am by O'Rielly &#38; Roche LLP
The Ninth Circuit panel also examined state decisional law interpreting § 16600, and pointed to Edwards v. [read post]
California Partner Departure Law - http://www.partnerdeparturelaw.com/
Ninth Circuit Jeopardizes Broad “No Re-Hire” Clauses
15 Apr 2015, 8:55 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Arthur Andersen LLP, 189 P.3d 285 (Cal. 2008); City of Oakland v. [read post]
California Peculiarities Employment Law Blog - http://www.calpeculiarities.com/
Ninth Circuit Jeopardizes Broad “No Re-Hire” Clauses in California
13 Apr 2015, 12:06 pm by Robert B. Milligan and Carrie Price
Arthur Andersen LLP, 189 P.3d 285 (Cal. 2008); City of Oakland v. [read post]
Trading Secrets - http://www.tradesecretslaw.com/
Partner Departures and Golden v. California Emergency Physicians Medical Group: Does California’s Business and Professions Code § 16600 Void Any Partnership Provision that Restricts a Departing Partner’s Right to Compete?
12 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm by admin
The Ninth Circuit panel also examined state decisional law interpreting § 16600, and pointed to Edwards v. [read post]
California Partner Departure Law - http://www.partnerdeparturelaw.com/
Partner Departures and Golden v. California Emergency Physicians Medical Group: Does California’s Business and Professions Code § 16600 Void Any Partnership Provision that Restricts a Departing Partner’s Right to Compete?
12 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm by admin
The Ninth Circuit panel also examined state decisional law interpreting § 16600, and pointed to Edwards v. [read post]
California Partner Departure Law - http://www.partnerdeparturelaw.com/