Search for: "Edwards v. Arthur Andersen" Results 61 - 80 of 104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Ninth Circuit Jeopardizes Broad “No Re-Hire” Clauses in California
13 Apr 2015, 12:06 pm by Robert B. Milligan and Carrie Price
Arthur Andersen LLP, 189 P.3d 285 (Cal. 2008); City of Oakland v. [read post]
Trading Secrets - http://www.tradesecretslaw.com/
The California Supreme Court regularly cites dictionaries but does so far less often than the U.S. Supreme Court
30 Jun 2011, 11:04 am by Brad Pauley
  (Edwards v. [read post]
At the Lectern: Practicing Before the California Supreme Court - http://www.atthelectern.com/
California Seeks to Strengthen Its Policy Invalidating Noncompete Agreements
29 Sep 2023, 8:05 am by Julia Y. Trankiem and Michael A. Pearlson
Arthur Andersen LLP and void noncompete agreements in employment no matter how narrowly tailored. [read post]
Hunton Employment & Labor Law Perspectives - http://www.huntonlaborblog.com/
Ninth Circuit Seeks Guidance From California Supreme Court on Business to Business Non-Competes
23 Mar 2020, 11:05 am by Robert B. Milligan, Lauren Leibovitch and Miguel Ramirez
Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal. 4th 937, 946-47 (2008). [read post]
Trading Secrets - http://www.tradesecretslaw.com/
Recent Changes in Noncompete Law Around the Country
12 Aug 2011, 7:41 am by Russell Beck
Arthur Andersen decision. [read post]
Fair Competition Law Blog - http://faircompetitionlaw.com
Partner Departures and Golden v. California Emergency Physicians Medical Group: Does California’s Business and Professions Code § 16600 Void Any Partnership Provision that Restricts a Departing Partner’s Right to Compete?
12 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm by admin
The Ninth Circuit panel also examined state decisional law interpreting § 16600, and pointed to Edwards v. [read post]
California Partner Departure Law - http://www.partnerdeparturelaw.com/
California Court Underscores Unenforceability of Contractual Non-Solicitation Clauses
21 Aug 2009, 3:46 pm
Weideman Following the lead of the California Supreme Court’s recent decision in Edwards v. [read post]
California Labor & Employment Law Blog - http://www.callaborlaw.com/
California Court of Appeals Casts Doubt on Continued Validity of Employee Non-Solicitation Provisions
13 Nov 2018, 12:32 pm by Michael Weil
Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal. 4th 937 (2008), which rejected a “reasonableness” standard when applying Section 16600. [read post]
Employment Law and Litigation - http://blogs.orrick.com/employment/
AB 1076 Non-Compete Notice Deadline Is February 14
13 Feb 2024, 9:56 am by HRWatchdog
Lisa V. [read post]
HR Watchdog - http://hrwatchdog.calchamber.com/
You May Think That All Non-Compete Agreements Are Unenforceable Under California Law, But You Would Be Wrong
25 Jul 2011, 11:42 am by Peter Steinmeyer
 In Edwards v. [read post]
Trade Secrets and Noncompete Blog - http://www.tradesecretsnoncompetelaw.com/
Ninth Circuit Broadens California Rule Against Non-Competes
21 Apr 2015, 9:06 am by <a href='http://gtlaw.com/People/Kurt-A-Kappes'>Kurt Kappes</a>, <a href='http://gtlaw.com/People/JamesNelson'>James Nelson</a> and <a href=''>Michelle L. DuCharme</a>
Arthur Andersen, LLP (Edwards), 189 P.2d 285 (Cal. 2008). [read post]
GT L&E Blog - http://www.gtleblog.com/
California Courts Nix Non-Solicitation Clauses in Employment Agreements
6 Mar 2019, 6:48 am by Nassiri Law
In the 2008 case of Edwards v. [read post]
Orange County Employment Lawyers Blog - http://www.orangecountyemploymentlawyersblog.com/
Employee's Personal Data On Company Computers And Devices
5 May 2009, 8:25 am by Anthony Zaller
Arthur Andersen last year. [read post]
California Employment Law Report - http://www.californiaemploymentlawreport.com/
California Court of Appeal Decision Throws Specific Performance to the Wind for California Businesses Intending To Use Trade Secrets as a Basis to Enforce Covenants Not To Compete
1 Sep 2009, 3:08 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal.4th 937 (2008). [read post]
Trading Secrets - http://www.tradesecretslaw.com/
Golden State Crackdown on Non-Competes: California Enacts Second Non-Compete Law To Curtail Use of Non-Competes With Employees
18 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by Robert B. Milligan
So while the Edwards v. [read post]
Trading Secrets - http://www.tradesecretslaw.com/
Hidden Pitfalls of Old Non-Compete Provisions
21 Aug 2015, 10:23 am by James Kachmar
Arthur Andersen, LP, 44 Cal.4th 937 (2008).) [read post]
IP Law Blog - http://www.theiplawblog.com/
August 2008 Quick Links, Part 2
9 Sep 2008, 4:49 pm
Arthur Andersen (CA Sup. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
Partner Departures and Golden v. California Emergency Physicians Medical Group: Does California’s Business and Professions Code § 16600 Void Any Partnership Provision that Restricts a Departing Partner’s Right to Compete?
20 Apr 2015, 11:37 am by O'Rielly &#38; Roche LLP
The Ninth Circuit panel also examined state decisional law interpreting § 16600, and pointed to Edwards v. [read post]
California Partner Departure Law - http://www.partnerdeparturelaw.com/
Partner Departures and Golden v. California Emergency Physicians Medical Group: Does California’s Business and Professions Code § 16600 Void Any Partnership Provision that Restricts a Departing Partner’s Right to Compete?
12 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm by admin
The Ninth Circuit panel also examined state decisional law interpreting § 16600, and pointed to Edwards v. [read post]
California Partner Departure Law - http://www.partnerdeparturelaw.com/
Court Holds Employer's Settlement Agreement With Individual Class Members Is Valid
27 Feb 2009, 6:41 pm
Arthur Andersen (2008) supports their position. [read post]
California Employment Law Report - http://www.californiaemploymentlawreport.com/