Search for: "Edwards v. California"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,015
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2016, 5:04 pm
Arizona and Edwards v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:08 am
The case involves a California rule barring review of claims that were not raised on direct appeal. [read post]
19 May 2016, 8:51 am
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
Bean v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 9:06 am
Apr. 26, 2016), Judge Edward F. [read post]
2 May 2016, 1:11 pm
Edwards, 185 N.C.App. 701, 649 S.E.2d 646 (North Carolina Court of Appeals 2007). [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:04 am
” The court harkened back to the California case Edwards v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:11 am
” The court harkened back to the California case Edwards v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 2:52 pm
Mishkin Since it was filed in a California federal court in July 2012, we have been following CFPB v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:48 am
Commentary on Zubik v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 2:59 am
Tom Edwards (A&O) reports. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 12:17 pm
In Habeas Corpus Resource Center v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 2:49 pm
In a classic case of statutory interpretation, in which every technical thrust seemed to be met by an equally adept technical parry, Lockhart v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 7:03 am
Metcalf, Ideologies of the Raj(Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1995); Edward R. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 6:25 am
LEXIS 15200 (ED CA, Feb. 5, 2016, a California federal magistrate judge allowed a Jewish inmate to move ahead with his free exercise and retaliation complaints regarding failure to provide kosher food and Jewish religious services on many occasions.In Edwards v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:54 am
In Barrett v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 9:50 am
Barclay v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 1:39 pm
On July 21, 2015, Senators Edward Markey (D-Mass.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) proposed legislation (S. 1806) requiring the Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to team with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to establish certain consumer data privacy and car computer network security rules to prevent hacking in all motor vehicles manufactured for sale in the U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 5:19 am
Regents of the Univ. of Calif. , Jan. 13, 2016, California Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District More Blog Entries: Edwards v. [read post]