Search for: "Edwards v. California" Results 161 - 180 of 1,105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
CA Appeals Court Holds Local Governments can Exercise their Police Power to Regulate or Ban Facilities that Distribute Medical Marijuana by Means of Zoning Ordinances
9 Jan 2015, 9:49 pm by Patricia Salkin
California Holistic Healing & Wellness v County of San Bernardino, 2014 WL 6973688 (CA App. unrep. 12/10/2014)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Medical Marijuana [read post]
Law of the Land - http://lawoftheland.wordpress.com/
Non-Compete Agreements In Many Instances Have Been Struck Down by The California Supreme Court
12 Apr 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
The case, called Edwards v. [read post]
California Injury Attorney Blog - http://www.california-injury-attorney-blog.com/
Uber class action ruling expected to have national implications
2 Sep 2015, 11:11 am by Tammy Binford
District Judge Edward Chen ruled September 1 that a group of Uber drivers in California can sue as a class as they argue that they should be considered employees instead of independent contractors. [read post]
Human Resources News - http://blogs.hrhero.com/hrnews/
[Eugene Volokh] How to Lose a Case Against an Empty Chair
9 May 2019, 9:48 am by Eugene Volokh
Krueger in Sacramento, plaintiff Edward Misleh (a lawyer) sued two commenters for defamation. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Partner Departures and Golden v. California Emergency Physicians Medical Group: Does California’s Business and Professions Code § 16600 Void Any Partnership Provision that Restricts a Departing Partner’s Right to Compete?
20 Apr 2015, 11:37 am by O'Rielly & Roche LLP
The Ninth Circuit panel also examined state decisional law interpreting § 16600, and pointed to Edwards v. [read post]
California Partner Departure Law - http://www.partnerdeparturelaw.com/
Partner Departures and Golden v. California Emergency Physicians Medical Group: Does California’s Business and Professions Code § 16600 Void Any Partnership Provision that Restricts a Departing Partner’s Right to Compete?
12 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm by admin
The Ninth Circuit panel also examined state decisional law interpreting § 16600, and pointed to Edwards v. [read post]
California Partner Departure Law - http://www.partnerdeparturelaw.com/
Dry Times: How to Deal with the Impact of California’s Drought on Critical Commercial Agreements
23 Apr 2014, 3:07 pm by Carren Shulman
For the purposes of California law, the California Supreme Court gave the definitive definition of a force majeure in Pacific Vegetable Oil Corp. v. [read post]
Bankruptcy and Restructuring Blog - http://www.bankruptcylawblog.com/
Northern California Courts Rule in Bankruptcy Cases
7 Dec 2010, 12:50 am by Mike
District Court for the Northern District of California Bankruptcy Judges have recently released memorandum decisions, among them: Martinez v. [read post]
Northern District of California Blog - http://www.ndcalblog.com/
Principles of personal jurisdiction apply to matrimonial litigation in which a plaintiff seeks to impose affirmative duties on a defendant
3 Jul 2012, 8:16 am by PaulKostro
ARSHAK EDWARD MIRZOYAN, App. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
Is My Restrictive Covenant Legal Under California Law?
24 Sep 2014, 11:24 pm by Jarod Bona
The California Supreme Court in Edwards v. [read post]
The Antitrust Attorney Blog - http://www.theantitrustattorney.com/
Acosta v. Wedbush: Motion to Dismiss Claim of Violations of ERISA Denied
18 Oct 2017, 12:00 am by Kevin Watson
In Acosta v. [read post]
The Race to the Bottom - https://www.theracetothebottom.org/blog/
Judge Halts Termination of Temporary Protected Status for El Salvador, Haiti, Nicaragua, Sudan
4 Oct 2018, 2:09 pm by Forrest G. Read IV
California Federal Judge Edward M. [read post]
Global Immigration Blog - http://www.globalimmigrationblog.com
Update on cases challenging Cordray appointment
30 May 2013, 6:00 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
  The California case, CFPB v. [read post]
CFPB Monitor - http://www.cfpbmonitor.com
Northern District of California Relies on the Safe Harbor Defense of Section 271(e)(1) to Resolve Infringement Cases Early
30 Nov 2020, 9:28 am by Christopher H. Strate and Jean E. Dassie
In Edwards Lifesciences v. [read post]
Real Property & Environmental Law Alert - http://www.rpelawalert.com/
Northern District of California Relies on the Safe Harbor Defense of Section 271(e)(1) to Resolve Infringement Cases Early
30 Nov 2020, 9:28 am by Christopher H. Strate and Jean E. Dassie
In Edwards Lifesciences v. [read post]
IP Law Alert - http://www.iplawalert.com
Northern District of California Relies on the Safe Harbor Defense of Section 271(e)(1) to Resolve Infringement Cases Early
30 Nov 2020, 9:28 am by Christopher H. Strate and Jean E. Dassie
In Edwards Lifesciences v. [read post]
Employment Law Alert - http://www.employmentlawalert.com
California Court Rules That Anti-SLAPP Statute Does Not Apply to Legal Malpractice.
6 Nov 2015, 10:21 am by The Clinton Law Firm
Edward X. [read post]
Chicago Legal Malpractice Lawyer Blog - http://www.chicagolegalmalpracticelawyerblog.com/
California Supreme Court Grants Review in Case Addressing Validity of Non-Compete Provisions
30 Oct 2007, 4:06 pm
  This is further bolstered by the fact that another case addressing these issues  -- Edwards v. [read post]
California Labor & Employment Law Blog - http://www.callaborlaw.com/
A Fool For a Client
20 Jun 2008, 12:21 am
California. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
Demanda Despedido por el Juez Federal
7 Jul 2011, 12:52 pm
La tendencia actual en relación con los litigios que rodean el Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) ha sido reafirmado por un juez de Washington DC en el caso, Doreen Edwards et al v. [read post]
Sacramento Bankruptcy Attorneys Blog - http://www.sacramento-bankruptcy-attorneys-blog.com/