Search for: "Edwards v. Franke" Results 1 - 20 of 287
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2015, 7:21 am by admin
First place this year went to the writing team of Michael Duke and Edward Flores, along with editor Jacob Brandler, for their work on King v Burwell–the case challenging the tax credit structure of the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:02 am by Paul M. Secunda
Franks, No. 13-483 (June 19, 2014), while two subsequent posts will discuss the labor law cases of Harris v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 12:58 pm by Jaclyn Belczyk
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [official website] unanimously Thursday in Lane v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 12:11 pm by Ruthann Robson
Franks (Art Lien) The case involves Edward Lane, who had been director of a program for at-risk youth at Central Alabama Community College (CACC). [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 2:13 pm by Ruthann Robson
  Arguing for Edward Lane, Tejinder Singh suggested a narrow holding that essentially reasserted Garcetti v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 7:20 am
High Court Brightens Rule Against Non-Compete PactsIn Edwards v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 5:13 am
Law.Com reports  on Positive Software Solutions, et al. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:16 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
BAI Ltd v Thomas Bates and Son Ltd, BAI Ltd v Durham, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance Company and Adur District Council and Ors, Independent Insurance Company Ltd v Fleming and Anor, Municipal Mutual Insurance Company v Zurich Insurance Company and Ors, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Edwards, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Akzo Nobel UK Ltd and Excess… [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 3:15 am
Speaking following the Supreme Court judgment on Sharland v Sharland, Jo Edwards, chair of family law organisation Resolution, said:"The success of Mrs Sharland and Mrs Gohil today is a clear indicator that anything less than full and frank disclosure of assets in divorce cases will not be tolerated by the courts, where this has an outcome on the order that the court would otherwise have made. [read post]